Meeting in the Middle
As a Gen X-er, I found Gen Y workers difficult to adjust to--and eventually learned a meet-in-the-middle approach seemed to have to best result.
January 31, 2010 at 07:00 PM
5 minute read
Several years ago, when I was senior editor and the magazine was called Corporate Legal Times, I was in charge of finding internship candidates and supervising them once they were on board. It seemed easy enough. I worked closely with my contact at the university, he or she would send over one or two candidates, and after I determined the potential intern was up to the task, I put him to work.
Even though the difference in age between these students and me was only about 10 years, the difference in what I perceived to be “work ethic” was huge. Despite the fact our work hours were from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., interns would often stroll in around 9:30 without even considering explaining the 30-minute tardiness. On one occasion, my supervisor needed information on a project an intern had been working on, but when he approached the intern in the kitchen around noon with his question, the intern immediately responded, “I'm on my lunch break now. I'll get back to you later.”
Then there was the infamous intern–the one I still talk about to this very day, her likeness and bizarre ways tattooed onto my memory. She encompassed everything that I saw wrong with these kids. Not only did she come in late and immediately roll her eyes if someone approached her during a break, but she would completely disappear during lunch with no warning or explanation when she returned. This wasn't much of an issue until I learned she was going into the back of our office where we had several empty cubes to take naps on the floor under desks.
But what surprised me about all these interns–even the napper–was that when they were at their desks working, they did a great job. These kids were bright, focused, hard workers. But they made it clear to me: They wanted to work on their terms, not mine.
As a Gen X-er, I found Gen Y workers difficult to adjust to–and eventually learned a meet-in-the-middle approach seemed to have to best result. But for some Baby Boomer bosses, this work style is totally foreign, and making accommodations is a difficult proposition.
In this month's cover story (“Mind the Gap“), InsideCounsel takes a look at how this new generation of lawyers is impacting legal departments, and what in-house counsel can do to effectively handle these valuable employees in the workplace.
Several years ago, when I was senior editor and the magazine was called Corporate Legal Times, I was in charge of finding internship candidates and supervising them once they were on board. It seemed easy enough. I worked closely with my contact at the university, he or she would send over one or two candidates, and after I determined the potential intern was up to the task, I put him to work.
Even though the difference in age between these students and me was only about 10 years, the difference in what I perceived to be “work ethic” was huge. Despite the fact our work hours were from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., interns would often stroll in around 9:30 without even considering explaining the 30-minute tardiness. On one occasion, my supervisor needed information on a project an intern had been working on, but when he approached the intern in the kitchen around noon with his question, the intern immediately responded, “I'm on my lunch break now. I'll get back to you later.”
Then there was the infamous intern–the one I still talk about to this very day, her likeness and bizarre ways tattooed onto my memory. She encompassed everything that I saw wrong with these kids. Not only did she come in late and immediately roll her eyes if someone approached her during a break, but she would completely disappear during lunch with no warning or explanation when she returned. This wasn't much of an issue until I learned she was going into the back of our office where we had several empty cubes to take naps on the floor under desks.
But what surprised me about all these interns–even the napper–was that when they were at their desks working, they did a great job. These kids were bright, focused, hard workers. But they made it clear to me: They wanted to work on their terms, not mine.
As a Gen X-er, I found Gen Y workers difficult to adjust to–and eventually learned a meet-in-the-middle approach seemed to have to best result. But for some Baby Boomer bosses, this work style is totally foreign, and making accommodations is a difficult proposition.
In this month's cover story (“Mind the Gap“), InsideCounsel takes a look at how this new generation of lawyers is impacting legal departments, and what in-house counsel can do to effectively handle these valuable employees in the workplace.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom Reluctant Lawyer to Legal Trailblazer: Agiloft's GC on Redefining In-House Counsel With Innovation and Tech
7 minute readLegal Tech's Predictions for Legal Ops & In-House in 2025
Lawyers Drowning in Cases Are Embracing AI Fastest—and Say It's Yielding Better Outcomes for Clients
Trending Stories
- 1Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 2Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 3Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
- 4Zoom Faces Intellectual Property Suit Over AI-Based Augmented Video Conferencing
- 5Judge Grants TRO Blocking Federal Funding Freeze
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250