Your Last Job
Setting yourself on the right path is critical to achieving career satisfaction.
January 31, 2010 at 07:00 PM
7 minute read
I was talking with a friend the other day. (It was after a late-night ice hockey game against a team that included a columnist for this magazine, but those are other stories).
We were discussing career alternatives. As I have noted in this space before, keeping inside counsel engaged and motivated can be a challenge, but it is one of the most important deliverables that any manager has.
My friend (a recovering attorney who has worked for exchange-listed companies as well as founded start-ups), passed on a bit of wisdom he'd picked up along the way. “Don't focus so much on what your next job is going to be,” he said. “What do you want your last job to be?”
The shelves at Amazon and Borders are filled with management books that make the same point, albeit often in more or better words. (The authors Covey, Blanchard & Johnson and Wooden come to mind.) Instead of surveying that literature, however, I thought I might try to apply those principles to life, or at least work, in the law.
My sense is that most attorneys are either predominantly gurus or managers. As outside counsel, being a guru might mean you're the go-to guy for employment matters, in your region or otherwise. As in-house counsel, it may mean you're the person that can cut through the volume of employment, antitrust, securities, IP, real estate, etc., advice dispensed by outside counsel to come up with actionable deliverables that reflect the risk, cost and time constraints of your company's business.
A manager is supposed to be a kind of guru as well–a guru of the human condition. Managers are people who are charged–regardless of whether they realize it–with enabling people to achieve their worth and potential.
Gurus and managers face different career challenges. In a connected world, being a guru is becoming a tougher and tougher gig. Anyone with a browser has access to the data, and so judgment and responsiveness ultimately become the differentiators between which guru to follow. In contrast, managers are usually subject to a corporate pyramid; there's only so far they can go before they're being managed themselves. Whether one is predominantly a guru or manager, managing “up” may ultimately be the most important management skill, but that's for another column.
And so, while the roles are not exclusive, my sense is the next step to the last job is to assess which camp you're in. If you are currently tasked with being a manager, you also need to do this assessment with your employees, and share it with them, regardless if it fits into the current template human resources is sending you to do performance appraisals and career development.
Once you've done that, the questions become:
1. Am I the best guru or manager I can be?
2. Am I on a path to that last job?, and (if applicable)
3. Am I helping my people (and are they helping their people) to answer these questions?
If the answer to all three is “Yes,” then please contact me. I would like to work for you. If you're delivering the best advice you're capable of to your clients, and helping all of your charges and colleagues be the best they can be, well done.
If your answers are more akin to “Kind of, sort of, occasionally,” welcome to my club.
One of our corporate directives at Novellus is “Recognize efforts; reward results.” While it is technically be too late to make New Year's resolutions, it is not be too late to rally.
I wish you and yours the best of luck in your path to the last job, in 2010 and beyond.
I was talking with a friend the other day. (It was after a late-night ice hockey game against a team that included a columnist for this magazine, but those are other stories).
We were discussing career alternatives. As I have noted in this space before, keeping inside counsel engaged and motivated can be a challenge, but it is one of the most important deliverables that any manager has.
My friend (a recovering attorney who has worked for exchange-listed companies as well as founded start-ups), passed on a bit of wisdom he'd picked up along the way. “Don't focus so much on what your next job is going to be,” he said. “What do you want your last job to be?”
The shelves at Amazon and Borders are filled with management books that make the same point, albeit often in more or better words. (The authors Covey, Blanchard & Johnson and Wooden come to mind.) Instead of surveying that literature, however, I thought I might try to apply those principles to life, or at least work, in the law.
My sense is that most attorneys are either predominantly gurus or managers. As outside counsel, being a guru might mean you're the go-to guy for employment matters, in your region or otherwise. As in-house counsel, it may mean you're the person that can cut through the volume of employment, antitrust, securities, IP, real estate, etc., advice dispensed by outside counsel to come up with actionable deliverables that reflect the risk, cost and time constraints of your company's business.
A manager is supposed to be a kind of guru as well–a guru of the human condition. Managers are people who are charged–regardless of whether they realize it–with enabling people to achieve their worth and potential.
Gurus and managers face different career challenges. In a connected world, being a guru is becoming a tougher and tougher gig. Anyone with a browser has access to the data, and so judgment and responsiveness ultimately become the differentiators between which guru to follow. In contrast, managers are usually subject to a corporate pyramid; there's only so far they can go before they're being managed themselves. Whether one is predominantly a guru or manager, managing “up” may ultimately be the most important management skill, but that's for another column.
And so, while the roles are not exclusive, my sense is the next step to the last job is to assess which camp you're in. If you are currently tasked with being a manager, you also need to do this assessment with your employees, and share it with them, regardless if it fits into the current template human resources is sending you to do performance appraisals and career development.
Once you've done that, the questions become:
1. Am I the best guru or manager I can be?
2. Am I on a path to that last job?, and (if applicable)
3. Am I helping my people (and are they helping their people) to answer these questions?
If the answer to all three is “Yes,” then please contact me. I would like to work for you. If you're delivering the best advice you're capable of to your clients, and helping all of your charges and colleagues be the best they can be, well done.
If your answers are more akin to “Kind of, sort of, occasionally,” welcome to my club.
One of our corporate directives at Novellus is “Recognize efforts; reward results.” While it is technically be too late to make New Year's resolutions, it is not be too late to rally.
I wish you and yours the best of luck in your path to the last job, in 2010 and beyond.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBallooning Workloads, Dearth of Advancement Opportunities Prime In-House Attorneys to Pull Exit Hatch
The Reason a GC Abruptly Departs May Not Be What You Think
Trending Stories
- 1Tips For Creating Holiday Plans That Everyone Can Be Grateful For
- 2Red Tape, Talent Wars & Pricey Office Space Greet Firms Entering Saudi Arabia
- 3A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Becoming Clerk of the Forum
- 4Pa. Supreme Court Taps New Philadelphia Family Division Administrative Judge
- 55th Circuit Rules Open-Source Code Is Not Property in Tornado Cash Appeal
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250