Capital One Partners with Network For Good to Do Good
Charitable Web portal brings donors and charities together at a low cost.
March 31, 2010 at 08:00 PM
11 minute read
In a previous column (“Charitable Charge,” February 2010), I took credit card companies to task for charging transaction fees when their cards were used to make charitable contributions. My point was that for all the bailout money they received with no strings attached they should be able to absorb the relatively small cost of assuring that a charity gets a full $1,000 when I use my card to contribute that amount.
Almost immediately I got an e-mail from Pam Girardo, spokesperson for the card issuer Capital One. She told me her company already does what I had urged Congress to require.
She directed me to the No Hassle Giving Site (www.capitalone.com/give) that promises when you use your Capital One card to donate, the company will cover all the transaction costs so that 100 percent of your donation reaches the charity of your choice. I was intrigued by the mechanism of the program.
It turns out a non-profit charity makes the program possible. The site is powered by a separate organization called Network for Good (NFG), an online charity portal. Technically, it is a donor-advised fund (thereby giving it tax-exempt status); its mission is to use the efficiency of the Internet to bring donors and charities together at a low cost. Capital One's arrangement started with grants to cover NFG's costs of handling Capital One cardholders' donations. Then the card issuer made the business decision to absorb all the transaction costs on its side. According to Girardo, this decision was made at a high executive level and was justified on the expectation that the program would encourage customer loyalty and result in more card usage overall.
Cardholders can make a donation to any of 1.2 million legitimate charities (those listed as such by the IRS) by using the Capital One site to search for the selected charity and click on “donate now.” According to the fine print, the donation is actually made to NFG, thereby qualifying the donor to deduct the contribution on his tax return. In turn, NFG forwards the donation to the charity. It will honor the donor's request to designate the contribution to a particular program or in honor of someone else. If for some reason the named charity has been disqualified by the IRS, does not appear on the list or has simply ceased to exist, NFG will select an alternate charity. As a donor-advised fund, NFG has what the IRS calls “exclusive legal control” over donations to it, and it is not required to return donations when the named charity can't receive them. A NFG representative told me this legalism is not as harsh as it seems. The situation rarely arises. The cost and hassle of returning small donations is prohibitive for the charity. And, when the amounts and the particular situation warrants, NFG will revisit the rule.
The partnership of Capital One and NFG seems to be working as designed. In November 2009, the relatively new program passed $1 million in donations. This past January there was an 850 percent increase in donations from January 2009, and that was before the surge of donations prompted by the Haitian earthquake. On its own, since NFG was founded in 2001 it has raised $370 million for 50,000 charities.
Capital One is not alone among banks and card issuers in forgiving transaction fees on charitable donations. Other companies now forgive such fees on donations to Haitian relief, for example, but they tend to do so for a limited time, such as 60 or 90 days. Capita One believes it is the only company to absorb the fees on donations to any charity on a year-round basis.
So I give props to this big financial institution. It takes nothing away from Capital One that it has a business rationale (more card usage) for doing this good thing. It is, after all, a for-profit company. It deserves credit (pun intended) for giving this program to its cardholders, so they can give too.
In a previous column (“Charitable Charge,” February 2010), I took credit card companies to task for charging transaction fees when their cards were used to make charitable contributions. My point was that for all the bailout money they received with no strings attached they should be able to absorb the relatively small cost of assuring that a charity gets a full $1,000 when I use my card to contribute that amount.
Almost immediately I got an e-mail from Pam Girardo, spokesperson for the card issuer
She directed me to the No Hassle Giving Site (www.capitalone.com/give) that promises when you use your
It turns out a non-profit charity makes the program possible. The site is powered by a separate organization called Network for Good (NFG), an online charity portal. Technically, it is a donor-advised fund (thereby giving it tax-exempt status); its mission is to use the efficiency of the Internet to bring donors and charities together at a low cost.
Cardholders can make a donation to any of 1.2 million legitimate charities (those listed as such by the IRS) by using the
The partnership of
So I give props to this big financial institution. It takes nothing away from
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGC With Deep GM Experience Takes Legal Reins of Power Management Giant
2 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute read'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readUS Reviewer of Foreign Transactions Sees More Political, Policy Influence, Say Observers
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250