Go to SuperConference!
Pay for it yourself if necessary, but go to SuperConference.
April 08, 2010 at 08:00 PM
5 minute read
If you have already signed up for InsideCounsel's SuperConference (May 25-26 in Chicago), then you “get it.” Thank you for reading my column, and please visit this space again next month. Now, for everyone else:
You have not signed up for one of three reasons. 1. Simple inertia. 2. You enjoy conferences, but you are busy and/or your company won't reimburse the expense. 3. You know you should go, but you would rather chew glass than network.
If you fall into the first category, I offer the following quote as great career advice: “Action may not always bring happiness, but there is no happiness without action.” (Benjamin Disraeli, former British Prime Minister)
However, I think my chances of persuading you to attend are better if you fit into category two or three. You are the readers who are already motivated to advance your careers, whether or not the activity involved in doing so is fun for you.
Why come? Even if you skip networking opportunities entirely, this conference merits your time and money in exchange for real best practices discussion. (Read InsideCounsel's wrap up of last year's conference topics.) If you go back to your legal department with one usable tool that will improve your personal performance, then you will have made a worthwhile investment in your career. If you can champion one single idea that leads to cost savings and/or better outcomes for your department as a whole, then you are laying the foundation for a promotion. For details on topics and CLE, click here.
Add networking to the mix and the decision to attend is a no brainer. There are only a couple of truly national conferences for inside counsel each year, so take advantage of this opportunity to meet colleagues from multiple industries. Start the kind of relationships that lead to unforeseen career opportunities in the future. If you happen to be seeking a new position now, visit my series of columns from April, May and June last year on maximizing conference attendance within the context of a job search.
I do understand that some companies will decline to pay for conference attendance, and that you may not even want to spend the political capital to ask. You're a successful professional. Think bigger picture and ante up. I spoke with my accountant who assures me that the entire trip is deductible as an educational expense. Attendance in 2009 was excellent and exceeded 2008. I expect another positive jump this year. Join us.
If you have already signed up for InsideCounsel's SuperConference (May 25-26 in Chicago), then you “get it.” Thank you for reading my column, and please visit this space again next month. Now, for everyone else:
You have not signed up for one of three reasons. 1. Simple inertia. 2. You enjoy conferences, but you are busy and/or your company won't reimburse the expense. 3. You know you should go, but you would rather chew glass than network.
If you fall into the first category, I offer the following quote as great career advice: “Action may not always bring happiness, but there is no happiness without action.” (Benjamin Disraeli, former British Prime Minister)
However, I think my chances of persuading you to attend are better if you fit into category two or three. You are the readers who are already motivated to advance your careers, whether or not the activity involved in doing so is fun for you.
Why come? Even if you skip networking opportunities entirely, this conference merits your time and money in exchange for real best practices discussion. (Read InsideCounsel's wrap up of last year's conference topics.) If you go back to your legal department with one usable tool that will improve your personal performance, then you will have made a worthwhile investment in your career. If you can champion one single idea that leads to cost savings and/or better outcomes for your department as a whole, then you are laying the foundation for a promotion. For details on topics and CLE, click here.
Add networking to the mix and the decision to attend is a no brainer. There are only a couple of truly national conferences for inside counsel each year, so take advantage of this opportunity to meet colleagues from multiple industries. Start the kind of relationships that lead to unforeseen career opportunities in the future. If you happen to be seeking a new position now, visit my series of columns from April, May and June last year on maximizing conference attendance within the context of a job search.
I do understand that some companies will decline to pay for conference attendance, and that you may not even want to spend the political capital to ask. You're a successful professional. Think bigger picture and ante up. I spoke with my accountant who assures me that the entire trip is deductible as an educational expense. Attendance in 2009 was excellent and exceeded 2008. I expect another positive jump this year. Join us.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBallooning Workloads, Dearth of Advancement Opportunities Prime In-House Attorneys to Pull Exit Hatch
The Reason a GC Abruptly Departs May Not Be What You Think
Trending Stories
- 1Steve Bannon 'We Build The Wall' Fraud Trial Pushed to February 2025
- 2'Nuclear Option'?: Eli Lilly Taps Big Law Firms in Federal Drug Pricing Dispute
- 3Questions About Foreclosure Abuse Prevention Act Remain Unanswered
- 4Santa Clara County Superior Court Authorizes Electronic Recording of Proceedings
- 5Ex-Deputy AG Trusts U.S. Legal System To Pull Country Through Times of Duress
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250