Trademark Squatting Sees Global Increase
More brand owners than ever are seeking to do business in foreign countries, only to find that their trademarks have been registered by unscrupulous individuals.
April 30, 2010 at 08:00 PM
4 minute read
International trademark squatting has boomed in the past 10 years. More brand owners than ever are seeking to do business in foreign countries, only to find that their trademarks have been registered by unscrupulous individuals who are willing to release the marks only if they are paid the right price.
The increase in such trademark extortion is an unintended consequence of globalization and the Internet. As more companies are doing business overseas, requiring more trademark registrations in foreign countries, the opportunity for trademark squatting has jumped. And squatters are finding it easier to take advantage of those opportunities thanks to the Internet, which enables the wrongdoers to quickly find likely trademarks to hijack.
“The Internet allows [squatters] to search databases of trademark applications, see what applications are being filed and check if there is a concurrent domestic application in whatever country that [squatter] is in,” says Robert L. Lee, a partner in Alston & Bird. “Not so long ago, WIPO [the World Intellectual Property Organization] didn't have search capabilities that allowed people to see which companies are filing what trademark applications where. Now, people can do that and see what marks companies think are valuable.”
International trademark squatting has boomed in the past 10 years. More brand owners than ever are seeking to do business in foreign countries, only to find that their trademarks have been registered by unscrupulous individuals who are willing to release the marks only if they are paid the right price.
The increase in such trademark extortion is an unintended consequence of globalization and the Internet. As more companies are doing business overseas, requiring more trademark registrations in foreign countries, the opportunity for trademark squatting has jumped. And squatters are finding it easier to take advantage of those opportunities thanks to the Internet, which enables the wrongdoers to quickly find likely trademarks to hijack.
“The Internet allows [squatters] to search databases of trademark applications, see what applications are being filed and check if there is a concurrent domestic application in whatever country that [squatter] is in,” says Robert L. Lee, a partner in
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBest Practices for Adopting and Adapting to AI: Mitigating Risk in Light of Increasing Regulatory and Shareholder Scrutiny
7 minute readFOMO Run Amok? Resolve of Firms Chasing AI Dreams Tested by Sky-High Costs
Just Ahead of Oral Argument, Fubo Settles Antitrust Case with Disney, Fox, Warner Bros.
Trending Stories
- 1Baker & Hostetler Appoints New Office Leaders in Philadelphia, Chicago
- 2Which Courts Are Open and Closed in Florida?
- 3Shareholder Claims Next Science Sold Risky Product Despite Knowing the Dangers
- 4Superior Court Rejects Pa. Hospital's Challenge to $7.3M Med Mal Judgment
- 5CFPB Alleges Berkshire Hathaway Subsidiary Originated Unaffordable Housing Loans
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250