Encouraging Diversity in Outside Counsel
In-house counsel should communicate to outside counsel that diversity really does matter.
May 31, 2010 at 08:00 PM
7 minute read
Rick Palmore, executive vice president, general counsel, and chief compliance and risk management officer of General Mills, wrote the “Call to Action” in 2004, which galvanized more than 200 CLOs of corporations to commit to promoting diversity in legal departments, as well as in the law firms that corporations engage.
For the in-house legal departments that have yet to commit to the Call to Action or those that only have a diversity policy, it is not too late to start the dialogue with outside counsel.
In-house lawyers can start with something as simple as a phone call.
Call your outside counsel. Begin the conversation. Reference your diversity policy, and communicate that it is a business imperative and important to the corporation, as well as to the law department. If you have never had this conversation with outside counsel, don't be concerned that you will offend them. The truth is many law firms have been working on diversity for a few years with the corporate legal departments that pushed and held them accountable through the Call to Action. These firms are warmed up, and some even may be waiting for your call.
After you discuss your policy, ask them about their numbers. How diverse is their firm? How many diverse associates, equity partners and nonequity partners do they have?
Delve deeper with the most important question of all: How many diverse lawyers are actually working on our legal matters? It is not good enough that in-house legal departments use law firms with a “good” diversity scorecard. If the actual legal matters the law firms handle for you don't have one diverse lawyer staffed on them, there is a big problem.
In-house attorneys must move diversity beyond being a feel-good proposition to being an imperative. This means driving it, especially as it relates to staffing legal matters.
Therefore, during the next one-on-one dialogue with outside counsel on staffing your legal matter, as the in-house counsel customer, you should and can easily request that the matter include diverse lawyers. Don't let stereotypes of inferiority give you pause or prevent you from giving a diverse lawyer a chance. Though some may argue that using diverse lawyers will result in negative consequences, the reality is that you have highly educated, competent and confident lawyers, who have all passed the bar. Evidently, they are able to perform; they just need an equal opportunity to do so.
Once the dialogue starts, continue it by measuring outside counsel's performance. This can be achieved by quarterly monitoring of the billable hours of the lawyers working on your matters. It will give you an indication of who is actually working on your matters and what level of work they perform (e.g., photocopying versus writing the motion papers).
Next, continue the communication by providing the firms with feedback on their performance. Let them know how they are doing, what they are doing well and where they need to improve. If helpful, provide comparisons with how some of your other firms are performing in the area of diversity.
Finally, reward firms that perform well with more business or–depending on how far you are in your diversity efforts–follow the lead of Brad Smith, senior vice president, general counsel and corporate secretary of Microsoft Corp., and give firms and senior executives in the law department a bonus if they improve diversity in measurable ways.
Remember diversity is not just good policy, it is also good business. The corporations and law firms that seriously invest in diversity maximize their business opportunities and effectuate meaningful change in furthering progress on an important issue in our profession.
Laurie N. Robinson is senior vice president and assistant general counsel at CBS Corp. and founder and CEO of Corporate Counsel Women of Color.
Rick Palmore, executive vice president, general counsel, and chief compliance and risk management officer of General Mills, wrote the “Call to Action” in 2004, which galvanized more than 200 CLOs of corporations to commit to promoting diversity in legal departments, as well as in the law firms that corporations engage.
For the in-house legal departments that have yet to commit to the Call to Action or those that only have a diversity policy, it is not too late to start the dialogue with outside counsel.
In-house lawyers can start with something as simple as a phone call.
Call your outside counsel. Begin the conversation. Reference your diversity policy, and communicate that it is a business imperative and important to the corporation, as well as to the law department. If you have never had this conversation with outside counsel, don't be concerned that you will offend them. The truth is many law firms have been working on diversity for a few years with the corporate legal departments that pushed and held them accountable through the Call to Action. These firms are warmed up, and some even may be waiting for your call.
After you discuss your policy, ask them about their numbers. How diverse is their firm? How many diverse associates, equity partners and nonequity partners do they have?
Delve deeper with the most important question of all: How many diverse lawyers are actually working on our legal matters? It is not good enough that in-house legal departments use law firms with a “good”
In-house attorneys must move diversity beyond being a feel-good proposition to being an imperative. This means driving it, especially as it relates to staffing legal matters.
Therefore, during the next one-on-one dialogue with outside counsel on staffing your legal matter, as the in-house counsel customer, you should and can easily request that the matter include diverse lawyers. Don't let stereotypes of inferiority give you pause or prevent you from giving a diverse lawyer a chance. Though some may argue that using diverse lawyers will result in negative consequences, the reality is that you have highly educated, competent and confident lawyers, who have all passed the bar. Evidently, they are able to perform; they just need an equal opportunity to do so.
Once the dialogue starts, continue it by measuring outside counsel's performance. This can be achieved by quarterly monitoring of the billable hours of the lawyers working on your matters. It will give you an indication of who is actually working on your matters and what level of work they perform (e.g., photocopying versus writing the motion papers).
Next, continue the communication by providing the firms with feedback on their performance. Let them know how they are doing, what they are doing well and where they need to improve. If helpful, provide comparisons with how some of your other firms are performing in the area of diversity.
Finally, reward firms that perform well with more business or–depending on how far you are in your diversity efforts–follow the lead of Brad Smith, senior vice president, general counsel and corporate secretary of
Remember diversity is not just good policy, it is also good business. The corporations and law firms that seriously invest in diversity maximize their business opportunities and effectuate meaningful change in furthering progress on an important issue in our profession.
Laurie N. Robinson is senior vice president and assistant general counsel at CBS Corp. and founder and CEO of Corporate Counsel Women of Color.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readGC With Deep GM Experience Takes Legal Reins of Power Management Giant
2 minute readPreparing for 2025: Anticipated Policy Changes Affecting U.S. Businesses Under the Trump Administration
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250