The Importance of Diversity in Corporate Legal Departments
The legal department plays a lead role in driving a company's diversity initiative.
June 30, 2010 at 08:00 PM
7 minute read
Although diversity is covered regularly in InsideCounsel's bi-monthly “Driving Diversity” column, it's always beneficial to reinforce such an important issue. This month, I would like to offer my thoughts and suggestions on the importance of diversity, and particularly the legal department's role. Every corporate legal department needs to set the gold standard for diversity in the workplace. The general counsel can't ask other executives of the company to develop diverse functional teams without first building a diverse legal department that demonstrates the values of diversity in the workplace.
Of course, the first task is to assemble a work force in the legal department that incorporates diversity among its legal, paralegal and administrative staff. However, merely building a diverse work force in the corporate setting is not the ultimate goal. This is where the management piece of the equation fits in. When properly managed, a diverse group will demonstrate increases in creativity and productivity, new attitudes among the department members, and the development of new processes and solutions.
How does a general counsel who has built a diverse legal department capitalize on the benefits of a diverse team?Encourage inclusion in making decisions. Actively solicit the views of your team members when making policy decisions that may affect the overall department and its interaction with the broader business clientele. The decision-making process should be a collective, collaborative effort. Recognize the added value that each team member brings to this decision-making process.
The general counsel must maintain an open mind prior to making a policy decision. Remind everyone that there is no one best way to approach a legal problem. Articulate that no one, including the general counsel, has all the answers. When the GC sets the stage in this manner, the department members will feel free to voice their opinions and listen to the opinions of others.Form project teams consisting of members from diverse backgrounds to handle special matters. It might seem the easier solution to build a project team that consists of members with the same background or previous experience with the matter. This group might be able to complete the project quicker but may do so by employing the same, previously used methods. Break that pattern: Construct a team of people and encourage them to use their different views and backgrounds to approach the matter in a new and better way. This will reduce or even eliminate the tendency to resort to getting the job done the same old way.
When your diverse team completes a project with a beneficial outcome, promote the success to your whole department and others in the company. Foster tolerance within the team. For those who are not used to working in a diverse work force, tension–sometimes under the surface–may arise as a result of the challenges posed by the differing views and backgrounds represented in a diverse team. Temper the opinions and egos of your team members so that no individual can undercut the goals of diversity. Encourage your team members who have demonstrated commitment to the goals of diversity to become involved in project teams outside the legal department. They will become advocates to the broader business community in confirming how diversity leads to the best business decisions. Remind everyone within the legal department that she has a role to play in making diversity in the workplace a vital tool. Each legal department member should be aware that she was selected on the basis of the unique background that she contributes. In order for a diverse work force to come alive and thrive, it requires the active engagement of everyone.
Although diversity is covered regularly in InsideCounsel's bi-monthly “Driving Diversity” column, it's always beneficial to reinforce such an important issue. This month, I would like to offer my thoughts and suggestions on the importance of diversity, and particularly the legal department's role. Every corporate legal department needs to set the gold standard for diversity in the workplace. The general counsel can't ask other executives of the company to develop diverse functional teams without first building a diverse legal department that demonstrates the values of diversity in the workplace.
Of course, the first task is to assemble a work force in the legal department that incorporates diversity among its legal, paralegal and administrative staff. However, merely building a diverse work force in the corporate setting is not the ultimate goal. This is where the management piece of the equation fits in. When properly managed, a diverse group will demonstrate increases in creativity and productivity, new attitudes among the department members, and the development of new processes and solutions.
How does a general counsel who has built a diverse legal department capitalize on the benefits of a diverse team?Encourage inclusion in making decisions. Actively solicit the views of your team members when making policy decisions that may affect the overall department and its interaction with the broader business clientele. The decision-making process should be a collective, collaborative effort. Recognize the added value that each team member brings to this decision-making process.
The general counsel must maintain an open mind prior to making a policy decision. Remind everyone that there is no one best way to approach a legal problem. Articulate that no one, including the general counsel, has all the answers. When the GC sets the stage in this manner, the department members will feel free to voice their opinions and listen to the opinions of others.Form project teams consisting of members from diverse backgrounds to handle special matters. It might seem the easier solution to build a project team that consists of members with the same background or previous experience with the matter. This group might be able to complete the project quicker but may do so by employing the same, previously used methods. Break that pattern: Construct a team of people and encourage them to use their different views and backgrounds to approach the matter in a new and better way. This will reduce or even eliminate the tendency to resort to getting the job done the same old way.
When your diverse team completes a project with a beneficial outcome, promote the success to your whole department and others in the company. Foster tolerance within the team. For those who are not used to working in a diverse work force, tension–sometimes under the surface–may arise as a result of the challenges posed by the differing views and backgrounds represented in a diverse team. Temper the opinions and egos of your team members so that no individual can undercut the goals of diversity. Encourage your team members who have demonstrated commitment to the goals of diversity to become involved in project teams outside the legal department. They will become advocates to the broader business community in confirming how diversity leads to the best business decisions. Remind everyone within the legal department that she has a role to play in making diversity in the workplace a vital tool. Each legal department member should be aware that she was selected on the basis of the unique background that she contributes. In order for a diverse work force to come alive and thrive, it requires the active engagement of everyone.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
8 minute readWhy ACLU's New Legal Director Says It's a 'Good Time to Take the Reins'
'Utterly Bewildering': GCs Struggle to Grasp Scattershot Nature of Law Firm Rate Hikes
Trending Stories
- 1Tips For Creating Holiday Plans That Everyone Can Be Grateful For
- 2Red Tape, Talent Wars & Pricey Office Space Greet Firms Entering Saudi Arabia
- 3A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Becoming Clerk of the Forum
- 4Pa. Supreme Court Taps New Philadelphia Family Division Administrative Judge
- 55th Circuit Rules Open-Source Code Is Not Property in Tornado Cash Appeal
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250