Regulatory: Regulation and Recovery from the Recession
Today's regulatory process may be creating disincentives to investments that could accelerate the recession recovery.
August 17, 2010 at 08:00 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Regulatory uncertainty is a significant factor in the slow recovery from the recession. Once-in-a-generation changes are being made in the regulations governing the health care, financial services, energy and communications industries, which collectively account for a substantial percentage of GDP. Congress also must address the imminent expiration of the Bush tax cuts; probably after the November elections.
At the same time, a sluggish economic recovery is underway, marked by low levels of corporate investment despite the lowest borrowing costs in a half-century. Enterprises are reluctant to invest because they cannot predict the changes in business models, staffing and infrastructure that will be necessary to respond to the regulatory incentives and disincentives government will adopt. Two examples illustrate the problem.
Financial Services: To implement the massive reform legislation, federal regulatory agencies must issue hundreds of rules that will determine how financial institutions may operate. Treasury hopes to release by year's end a list of agency priorities and a schedule for rulemakings that will span several years. This long regulatory cycle will slow new investments.
This sweeping legislation already has had unintended consequences. For example, a minor change in the law made ratings agencies subject to suit when they lend their opinions to bond issuers introducing new products. In response, the ratings agencies prohibited clients from using their opinions in SEC registration documents. As a result, the market for securitizing car loans and consumer loans shut down. The SEC was forced to suspend its rule requiring underwriters to include credit ratings in prospectuses. The uncertainty regarding use of these ratings also has delayed indefinitely the government's imposition of enhanced risk-based capital standards on smaller banks.
Communications: To encourage Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to invest in broadband infrastructure, the Bush FCC classified DSL services as “information services,” which subjected them to a lesser degree of regulation than would treatment as “telecommunications services,” a regulatory regime originally designed for natural monopolies such as the old AT&T. The Obama FCC wants to impose “net neutrality” rules that would prevent ISPs from discriminating against customers in the priority and speed of service. Stung by court decisions limiting its legal authority over information services, the FCC reacted by proposing to reclassify broadband as a telecommunications service, which would subject it to more intrusive regulatory controls. Opponents object that reclassification would deter many billions of dollars in new investment. To break this impasse, after extensive negotiations leading antagonists Google and Verizon agreed on their own framework to prevent discrimination, under which ISPs could not block content producers or offer them a “fast lane” (paid prioritization). Cellphone networks, however, would be excluded from this framework. Announcement of this private sector alternative likely will force Congress to intervene and solve the problem by legislation. Investments will be deterred until Congress can settle this holy war over the principles governing the Internet.
Political and financial markets operate to their own rhythms. Unfortunately, the cycle of the regulatory process currently is creating disincentives to investments that could accelerate recovery from the recession.
John F. Cooney is a partner in the Washington, D.C., office of Venable.
Read John Cooney's previous column. Read John Cooney's next column.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhy Seemingly Simple Off-Channel Communication Rules Still Vex Finance Industry
5 minute readSEC Enforcement Chief Grewal—Whose Hard Line on Crypto Tormented the Industry—Stepping Down
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250