Economic Growth in Asia Deserves Attention
As the global economy changes, U.S. lawyers need to give Asia's growth due attention.
August 19, 2010 at 08:00 PM
4 minute read
Recessions always bring economic change. Headlines typically focus on the new economic forces they unleash. But even more powerfully, they reinforce economic changes that were already unfolding. When that happens, recessions contribute to fundamental and long-term shifts that impact every profession.
Ongoing economic trends are doing just that. Before the recession, economic growth in China and most of Asia (except Japan) was outpacing growth in North America and Western Europe. The recession has magnified this gap. While the American economy last year was contracting by more than 2 percent, China's economy was still growing by more than 8 percent. This year it's projected that the U.S. will rebound to positive growth of more than 2 percent; China will grow by more than 9 percent.
All of this adds up. By the end of next year, China likely will surpass the U.S. in market size for the purchase of automobiles, personal computers, television sets and many other products.
Since the end of World War II, the United States has been the largest market in the world for virtually all major products. But when it comes to economics, demographics eventually do become destiny. We increasingly live in a world in which economic consumption and production more closely resemble population. North America has only 5 percent of the world's people. Asia has 60 percent.
What does this mean for Americans and U.S. lawyers in particular?
First, we're going to have to learn more about the rest of the world and Asia specifically.
This needs to start well before law school. A recent study showed that only 4 percent of the nation's public high schools offer courses in Mandarin. In contrast, 13 percent offer Latin.
We also need to learn more about Asia's history, culture and philosophies. This includes the way these societies think about the role and rule of law. Comparative legal courses in U.S. law schools traditionally concentrated on the French, German, and British legal systems and their influences. While these remain of obvious importance, Confucian and other philosophies have also influenced legal thinking in Asia.
In all the meetings I've had with government officials around the world, there's only one place where I've found that people discuss legal issues in part by talking about something that happened in the year 221 B.C. That's the year the Qin Dynasty unified China. It shaped the way people in China think about the world today. If we're going to be effective counselors and advocates in the new global economy, it's the type of thing about which we need to be informed.
We need to embrace a second priority as well. The country and its leading institutions need to nurture our competitive economic strengths.
As the U.S. economy ceases to lead the world based on the size of its market, it's even more important that we lead in the influence of our innovations. Last year inventors in the U.S. accounted for just less than half of the world's newly granted patents. Innovation across the country remains robust, especially in technology fields based on science and engineering.
Yet it's clear that we need to continue to strengthen our innovation capacities. We need to improve education and augment basic research in critical fields. We need to continue to improve our intellectual property laws, and we need to ensure that our IP rights are better respected overseas.
The shifting global economy will be one of the defining elements of the entire 21st century. The country's long-term prosperity will depend in part on how we adapt. As lawyers advising institutions across the economy, we have an important role to play in helping the country adapt to the changes needed for long-term success.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250