The June Supreme Court ruling that gutted the honest services fraud doctrine was actually a response to three separate cases, involving former Enron CEO Jeffrey Skilling, Alaska legislator Bruce Weyhrauch and media baron Conrad Black, respectively. (Skilling v. United States was the lead case.)

Although the ruling is a victory for the plaintiffs, it's not an end to their legal troubles. The cases have been remanded for reconsideration.

The case against Skilling hinged on earnings manipulation. Prosecutors conflated that securities fraud charge with honest services fraud. Now the lower court will have to sort out whether the jury in its ruling differentiated between those issues.

“That's a really tricky analysis because you can't put the jury back in the room years later and say, 'OK, time to go at it again,'” says Joshua Berman, a white collar partner at Katten Muchin Rosenman. “The judge will essentially have to parse the jury instructions that were given, the proof that was established at trial, and in some ways make assumptions about what the jury did. It will be difficult now for the government to push hard on the other charges that Skilling was convicted on. I think it's an uphill battle.”

The ruling in Skilling won't just affect the Black and Weyhrauch cases but could be grounds for appealing or reopening other white-collar cases. Parts of the cases against former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich and former New York State Senate Majority Leader Joseph Bruno involved honest services fraud violations.

The June Supreme Court ruling that gutted the honest services fraud doctrine was actually a response to three separate cases, involving former Enron CEO Jeffrey Skilling, Alaska legislator Bruce Weyhrauch and media baron Conrad Black, respectively. (Skilling v. United States was the lead case.)

Although the ruling is a victory for the plaintiffs, it's not an end to their legal troubles. The cases have been remanded for reconsideration.

The case against Skilling hinged on earnings manipulation. Prosecutors conflated that securities fraud charge with honest services fraud. Now the lower court will have to sort out whether the jury in its ruling differentiated between those issues.

“That's a really tricky analysis because you can't put the jury back in the room years later and say, 'OK, time to go at it again,'” says Joshua Berman, a white collar partner at Katten Muchin Rosenman. “The judge will essentially have to parse the jury instructions that were given, the proof that was established at trial, and in some ways make assumptions about what the jury did. It will be difficult now for the government to push hard on the other charges that Skilling was convicted on. I think it's an uphill battle.”

The ruling in Skilling won't just affect the Black and Weyhrauch cases but could be grounds for appealing or reopening other white-collar cases. Parts of the cases against former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich and former New York State Senate Majority Leader Joseph Bruno involved honest services fraud violations.