Monitoring Employee Behavior at All Levels
Three examples illustrate in-house counsel's responsiblity to keep bad behvaior in check.
October 31, 2010 at 08:00 PM
5 minute read
I was driving in my car a few weeks ago with my 16-year-old niece, who had recently started her first job at a popular fast-food chain. I asked her how she likes it, and she enthusiastically said she loves it. Then I asked her how much she works, and she told me usually her shifts weren't longer than eight hours, but she has worked longer a few times–even more than 40 hours a week once. It was summer, she wasn't in school or sports, so I congratulated her on landing the overtime pay. “They didn't pay me overtime,” she said. “They told me they would on the days they asked me to stay, but when my check came, it wasn't there.” When she asked her manager about it, he shrugged it off. She didn't push the issue–she likes her job and wasn't interested in making trouble.
Last week, while traveling, I was listening to an episode of Public Radio International's “This American Life” called “Crybabies.” The show was about people who have had to kick and scream to get their way. One of the segments was about several disabled people in California who sue businesses to comply with Americans with Disabilities Act codes. Some of the show's guests were proud of their accomplishments in suing these companies–one even raked in six figures over the past few years in settlement money from his suits. But one woman, a lawyer herself, was too ashamed to file a lawsuit, in this case, against her hair salon over a parking space, saying she didn't want to be labeled the “bad disabled person” who was causing trouble.
Today, I opened the New York Times and read an article called “At Flagging Tribune, Tales of a Bankrupt Culture,” which detailed the appalling sexual harassment and debauchery that allegedly took place at the executive level within the media company since 2008.
Although each of these examples has a different degree of severity, I was surprised when I learned about all of them. Every day, I see and hear about in-house counsel who are always doing the right things, and keeping their companies on the straight and narrow. Still, each of these stories surprised–in fact, shocked–me. They underscore the importance of in-house attorneys' responsibilities to their clients.
If you haven't lately, take a closer look at what's going on in the lower levels of your companies. If you have, keep up the great work.
I was driving in my car a few weeks ago with my 16-year-old niece, who had recently started her first job at a popular fast-food chain. I asked her how she likes it, and she enthusiastically said she loves it. Then I asked her how much she works, and she told me usually her shifts weren't longer than eight hours, but she has worked longer a few times–even more than 40 hours a week once. It was summer, she wasn't in school or sports, so I congratulated her on landing the overtime pay. “They didn't pay me overtime,” she said. “They told me they would on the days they asked me to stay, but when my check came, it wasn't there.” When she asked her manager about it, he shrugged it off. She didn't push the issue–she likes her job and wasn't interested in making trouble.
Last week, while traveling, I was listening to an episode of Public Radio International's “This American Life” called “Crybabies.” The show was about people who have had to kick and scream to get their way. One of the segments was about several disabled people in California who sue businesses to comply with Americans with Disabilities Act codes. Some of the show's guests were proud of their accomplishments in suing these companies–one even raked in six figures over the past few years in settlement money from his suits. But one woman, a lawyer herself, was too ashamed to file a lawsuit, in this case, against her hair salon over a parking space, saying she didn't want to be labeled the “bad disabled person” who was causing trouble.
Today, I opened the
Although each of these examples has a different degree of severity, I was surprised when I learned about all of them. Every day, I see and hear about in-house counsel who are always doing the right things, and keeping their companies on the straight and narrow. Still, each of these stories surprised–in fact, shocked–me. They underscore the importance of in-house attorneys' responsibilities to their clients.
If you haven't lately, take a closer look at what's going on in the lower levels of your companies. If you have, keep up the great work.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom Reluctant Lawyer to Legal Trailblazer: Agiloft's GC on Redefining In-House Counsel With Innovation and Tech
7 minute readLegal Tech's Predictions for Legal Ops & In-House in 2025
Lawyers Drowning in Cases Are Embracing AI Fastest—and Say It's Yielding Better Outcomes for Clients
Trending Stories
- 1In Novel Oil and Gas Feud, 5th Circuit Gives Choice of Arbitration Venue
- 2Jury Seated in Glynn County Trial of Ex-Prosecutor Accused of Shielding Ahmaud Arbery's Killers
- 3Ex-Archegos CFO Gets 8-Year Prison Sentence for Fraud Scheme
- 4Judges Split Over Whether Indigent Prisoners Bringing Suit Must Each Pay Filing Fee
- 5Law Firms Report Wide Growth, Successful Billing Rate Increases and Less Merger Interest
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250