Student Support Programs Will Increase Legal Diversity
The Leadership Council for Legal Diversity focuses on helping current and future law students.
December 31, 2010 at 07:00 PM
7 minute read
I recently joined leaders across our profession at a meeting to address diversity in the legal profession. The nation's lawyers play a vital role in protecting the rights of individuals across society. To succeed, our profession needs to reflect the diversity of the country we serve.
Yet legal diversity has been moving forward at a pace that more closely resembles a glacier than a racecar. For example, women still account for less than 20 percent and minorities only about 6 percent of the partners in the nation's large law firms.
We need to do more than just talk about diversity. We need action.
For this reason, corporate general counsels and law firm managing partners came together to found the Leadership Council for Legal Diversity, or LCLD. Representing more than 160 law firms and companies, we recently launched new and concrete steps to advance diversity in the legal profession.
One of these initiatives focuses on the legal pipeline.
It is a challenge to decide where we should focus our efforts. On one level, the pipeline challenge is vast. As a country we're failing to graduate diverse people from college at a level that is representative of the population. But obviously the issues start well before college. Nationally, only about 75 percent of young people even graduate from high school. And our problems begin when children are still toddlers, as gaps in early learning mean that many underprivileged kids, in particular, start kindergarten unprepared to learn and never catch up.
There is also a plethora of great programs that one could choose to help. These span the age spectrum, and in truth most of them are short on resources and are more than worthy of support.
Ultimately, however, if we're going to have real impact, we need to make some choices. The country spends more than $240 billion annually on public education. The collective resources of lawyers will always represent a tiny fraction of this amount. We need to identify and pursue the most strategic opportunities.
At the recent LCLD meeting, we decided to concentrate our energy on one specific goal–increasing the number of diverse college graduates moving into and through law school. There were a couple of key factors that led to this choice.
First, the need is substantial. Currently, African-Americans account for 9.8 percent of college graduates but only 6.9 percent of law school enrollment. Similarly, the Hispanic-Latino population accounts for 7.9 percent of college graduates but only 6.1 percent of law
school students.
Second, we concluded that as a profession we are well equipped to help individuals move into and through law school, having gone through this process already. And if we don't address this opportunity, who will step forward instead?
It's up to those of us in the legal profession to do more to bring more diverse people into U.S. law schools. Now we need to take real strides to move forward.
We've decided to pursue two strategies. The first is focused on diverse students still in college. We need more programs to encourage diverse students to apply to law school and to help them prepare for the LSAT and for law school itself. A number of law firms and companies already support strong activities in this area, and we need to scale up successful programs to reach more people.
Second, we need to work more with diverse students entering law school. Part of this involves preparation for their first year of law school. And part involves more internship opportunities after the first year is completed.
If we're going to succeed, we need more help. We need more lawyers, legal departments and law firms to help advance this cause. You can make a difference. To learn how, spend a few minutes at www.lcldnet.org.
I recently joined leaders across our profession at a meeting to address diversity in the legal profession. The nation's lawyers play a vital role in protecting the rights of individuals across society. To succeed, our profession needs to reflect the diversity of the country we serve.
Yet legal diversity has been moving forward at a pace that more closely resembles a glacier than a racecar. For example, women still account for less than 20 percent and minorities only about 6 percent of the partners in the nation's large law firms.
We need to do more than just talk about diversity. We need action.
For this reason, corporate general counsels and law firm managing partners came together to found the Leadership Council for Legal Diversity, or LCLD. Representing more than 160 law firms and companies, we recently launched new and concrete steps to advance diversity in the legal profession.
One of these initiatives focuses on the legal pipeline.
It is a challenge to decide where we should focus our efforts. On one level, the pipeline challenge is vast. As a country we're failing to graduate diverse people from college at a level that is representative of the population. But obviously the issues start well before college. Nationally, only about 75 percent of young people even graduate from high school. And our problems begin when children are still toddlers, as gaps in early learning mean that many underprivileged kids, in particular, start kindergarten unprepared to learn and never catch up.
There is also a plethora of great programs that one could choose to help. These span the age spectrum, and in truth most of them are short on resources and are more than worthy of support.
Ultimately, however, if we're going to have real impact, we need to make some choices. The country spends more than $240 billion annually on public education. The collective resources of lawyers will always represent a tiny fraction of this amount. We need to identify and pursue the most strategic opportunities.
At the recent LCLD meeting, we decided to concentrate our energy on one specific goal–increasing the number of diverse college graduates moving into and through law school. There were a couple of key factors that led to this choice.
First, the need is substantial. Currently, African-Americans account for 9.8 percent of college graduates but only 6.9 percent of law school enrollment. Similarly, the Hispanic-Latino population accounts for 7.9 percent of college graduates but only 6.1 percent of law
school students.
Second, we concluded that as a profession we are well equipped to help individuals move into and through law school, having gone through this process already. And if we don't address this opportunity, who will step forward instead?
It's up to those of us in the legal profession to do more to bring more diverse people into U.S. law schools. Now we need to take real strides to move forward.
We've decided to pursue two strategies. The first is focused on diverse students still in college. We need more programs to encourage diverse students to apply to law school and to help them prepare for the LSAT and for law school itself. A number of law firms and companies already support strong activities in this area, and we need to scale up successful programs to reach more people.
Second, we need to work more with diverse students entering law school. Part of this involves preparation for their first year of law school. And part involves more internship opportunities after the first year is completed.
If we're going to succeed, we need more help. We need more lawyers, legal departments and law firms to help advance this cause. You can make a difference. To learn how, spend a few minutes at www.lcldnet.org.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A Warning Shot to Board Rooms': DOJ Decision to Fight $14B Tech Merger May Be Bad Omen for Industry
Exits Leave American Airlines, SiriusXM, Spotify Searching for New Legal Chiefs
2 minute read'Incredibly Complicated'? Antitrust Litigators Identify Pros and Cons of Proposed One Agency Act
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250