Student Support Programs Will Increase Legal Diversity
The Leadership Council for Legal Diversity focuses on helping current and future law students.
December 31, 2010 at 07:00 PM
7 minute read
I recently joined leaders across our profession at a meeting to address diversity in the legal profession. The nation's lawyers play a vital role in protecting the rights of individuals across society. To succeed, our profession needs to reflect the diversity of the country we serve.
Yet legal diversity has been moving forward at a pace that more closely resembles a glacier than a racecar. For example, women still account for less than 20 percent and minorities only about 6 percent of the partners in the nation's large law firms.
We need to do more than just talk about diversity. We need action.
For this reason, corporate general counsels and law firm managing partners came together to found the Leadership Council for Legal Diversity, or LCLD. Representing more than 160 law firms and companies, we recently launched new and concrete steps to advance diversity in the legal profession.
One of these initiatives focuses on the legal pipeline.
It is a challenge to decide where we should focus our efforts. On one level, the pipeline challenge is vast. As a country we're failing to graduate diverse people from college at a level that is representative of the population. But obviously the issues start well before college. Nationally, only about 75 percent of young people even graduate from high school. And our problems begin when children are still toddlers, as gaps in early learning mean that many underprivileged kids, in particular, start kindergarten unprepared to learn and never catch up.
There is also a plethora of great programs that one could choose to help. These span the age spectrum, and in truth most of them are short on resources and are more than worthy of support.
Ultimately, however, if we're going to have real impact, we need to make some choices. The country spends more than $240 billion annually on public education. The collective resources of lawyers will always represent a tiny fraction of this amount. We need to identify and pursue the most strategic opportunities.
At the recent LCLD meeting, we decided to concentrate our energy on one specific goal–increasing the number of diverse college graduates moving into and through law school. There were a couple of key factors that led to this choice.
First, the need is substantial. Currently, African-Americans account for 9.8 percent of college graduates but only 6.9 percent of law school enrollment. Similarly, the Hispanic-Latino population accounts for 7.9 percent of college graduates but only 6.1 percent of law
school students.
Second, we concluded that as a profession we are well equipped to help individuals move into and through law school, having gone through this process already. And if we don't address this opportunity, who will step forward instead?
It's up to those of us in the legal profession to do more to bring more diverse people into U.S. law schools. Now we need to take real strides to move forward.
We've decided to pursue two strategies. The first is focused on diverse students still in college. We need more programs to encourage diverse students to apply to law school and to help them prepare for the LSAT and for law school itself. A number of law firms and companies already support strong activities in this area, and we need to scale up successful programs to reach more people.
Second, we need to work more with diverse students entering law school. Part of this involves preparation for their first year of law school. And part involves more internship opportunities after the first year is completed.
If we're going to succeed, we need more help. We need more lawyers, legal departments and law firms to help advance this cause. You can make a difference. To learn how, spend a few minutes at www.lcldnet.org.
I recently joined leaders across our profession at a meeting to address diversity in the legal profession. The nation's lawyers play a vital role in protecting the rights of individuals across society. To succeed, our profession needs to reflect the diversity of the country we serve.
Yet legal diversity has been moving forward at a pace that more closely resembles a glacier than a racecar. For example, women still account for less than 20 percent and minorities only about 6 percent of the partners in the nation's large law firms.
We need to do more than just talk about diversity. We need action.
For this reason, corporate general counsels and law firm managing partners came together to found the Leadership Council for Legal Diversity, or LCLD. Representing more than 160 law firms and companies, we recently launched new and concrete steps to advance diversity in the legal profession.
One of these initiatives focuses on the legal pipeline.
It is a challenge to decide where we should focus our efforts. On one level, the pipeline challenge is vast. As a country we're failing to graduate diverse people from college at a level that is representative of the population. But obviously the issues start well before college. Nationally, only about 75 percent of young people even graduate from high school. And our problems begin when children are still toddlers, as gaps in early learning mean that many underprivileged kids, in particular, start kindergarten unprepared to learn and never catch up.
There is also a plethora of great programs that one could choose to help. These span the age spectrum, and in truth most of them are short on resources and are more than worthy of support.
Ultimately, however, if we're going to have real impact, we need to make some choices. The country spends more than $240 billion annually on public education. The collective resources of lawyers will always represent a tiny fraction of this amount. We need to identify and pursue the most strategic opportunities.
At the recent LCLD meeting, we decided to concentrate our energy on one specific goal–increasing the number of diverse college graduates moving into and through law school. There were a couple of key factors that led to this choice.
First, the need is substantial. Currently, African-Americans account for 9.8 percent of college graduates but only 6.9 percent of law school enrollment. Similarly, the Hispanic-Latino population accounts for 7.9 percent of college graduates but only 6.1 percent of law
school students.
Second, we concluded that as a profession we are well equipped to help individuals move into and through law school, having gone through this process already. And if we don't address this opportunity, who will step forward instead?
It's up to those of us in the legal profession to do more to bring more diverse people into U.S. law schools. Now we need to take real strides to move forward.
We've decided to pursue two strategies. The first is focused on diverse students still in college. We need more programs to encourage diverse students to apply to law school and to help them prepare for the LSAT and for law school itself. A number of law firms and companies already support strong activities in this area, and we need to scale up successful programs to reach more people.
Second, we need to work more with diverse students entering law school. Part of this involves preparation for their first year of law school. And part involves more internship opportunities after the first year is completed.
If we're going to succeed, we need more help. We need more lawyers, legal departments and law firms to help advance this cause. You can make a difference. To learn how, spend a few minutes at www.lcldnet.org.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFTC Settles With Security Firm Over AI Claims Under Agency's Compliance Program
6 minute readPeople and Purpose: AbbVie's GC on Leading With Impact and Inspiring Change
7 minute readDigging Deep to Mitigate Risk in Lithium Mine Venture Wins GM Legal Department of the Year Award
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Mediators for the Southern District of New York Honored at Eighth Annual James Duane Awards
- 2The Lawyers Picked by Trump For Key Roles in His Second Term
- 3Pa. High Court to Weigh Parent Company's Liability for Dissolved Subsidiary's Conduct
- 4Depo-Provera MDL Could Be Headed to California
- 5Judge Holds New York City in Contempt Over Conditions at City Jails
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250