Two Insurance Groups Disagree Over Intent, Scope Of Upcoming FIO Report
PropertyCasualty360.com, Jan. 19, 2011
January 19, 2011 at 07:00 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The National Association of Professional Insurance Agents (PIA) is calling on Congress to strip the Obama administration of its authority to make recommendations to Congress regarding future oversight of the insurance industry.
But another insurance association said it would oppose such an initiative by Congress and called PIA “out of touch.”
PIA contended in its statement that since any study and subsequent recommendations would be conducted by “federal bureaucrats,” the results are preordained.
Instead, PIA said in its statement that such a study should be conducted by a “nonpartisan entity,” such as the Government Accountability Office.
Under the Dodd-Frank financial services reform law, the Federal Insurance Office (FIO) is to conduct a study on insurance regulation and make recommendations.
But Fred Thomas, PIA president, said that it “is critical that this office not be permitted to conduct studies and make policy recommendations to Congress because it is clearly biased and will recommend that a vast new federal insurance bureaucracy be created. Congress needs to nip this in the bud right now.”
Blain Reithmeier, a spokesman for the American Insurance Association (AIA), disagreed with PIA's statement.
“Any suggestion to defund this essential study is out of touch with the challenges facing the industry,” said Mr. Rethmeier, AIA senior vice president of public affairs.
Read the complete PropertyCasualty360.com story, “Two Insurance Groups Disagree Over Intent, Scope Of Upcoming FIO Report.”
PropertyCasualty360.com is a Summit Business Media website.
The National Association of Professional Insurance Agents (PIA) is calling on Congress to strip the Obama administration of its authority to make recommendations to Congress regarding future oversight of the insurance industry.
But another insurance association said it would oppose such an initiative by Congress and called PIA “out of touch.”
PIA contended in its statement that since any study and subsequent recommendations would be conducted by “federal bureaucrats,” the results are preordained.
Instead, PIA said in its statement that such a study should be conducted by a “nonpartisan entity,” such as the Government Accountability Office.
Under the Dodd-Frank financial services reform law, the
But Fred Thomas, PIA president, said that it “is critical that this office not be permitted to conduct studies and make policy recommendations to Congress because it is clearly biased and will recommend that a vast new
Blain Reithmeier, a spokesman for the American Insurance Association (AIA), disagreed with PIA's statement.
“Any suggestion to defund this essential study is out of touch with the challenges facing the industry,” said Mr. Rethmeier, AIA senior vice president of public affairs.
Read the complete PropertyCasualty360.com story, “Two Insurance Groups Disagree Over Intent, Scope Of Upcoming FIO Report.”
PropertyCasualty360.com is a Summit Business Media website.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Likely to Keep Up Antitrust Enforcement, but Dial Back the Antagonism
5 minute readFTC Sues Cash-Advance Fintech Dave, Says It Deceives the 'Financially Vulnerable'
Policy Wonks' Obsession: What Will Tuesday's Election Mean for FTC Firebrand Khan?
6 minute readThe FTC's Rebecca Slaughter Wants Fair Competition, and a Good Night's Sleep
Trending Stories
- 1NY District Attorneys Ask for Level Funding Amid Statewide Drop in Violent Crime
- 2Texas Trial Boutique Matches Milbank Bonuses, Paying up to $140K
- 3'Final Countdown': SEC Launches Nearly 800% Litigation Surge in October
- 4On the Employment Front, What Changes Are Likely Under Trump?
- 5By the Numbers: The 2024 LTN Law Firm Tech Survey
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250