The Benefits of a Bottom-Up Approach to Diversity
More than ever, clients are looking to their firms to bring the best solutions to the table.
April 30, 2011 at 08:00 PM
5 minute read
Recently, I had the privilege–along with InsideCounsel Publisher Tom Duggan–to moderate a panel of senior-level in-house counsel at the Legal Marketing Association's annual conference this year in Orlando, Fla. The title of the discussion was “Achieving Greater Collaboration: Getting a Win-Win Relationship with In-House Counsel.” The audience was a large group of law firm chief marketing officers, managers and other legal marketing professionals.
The three panelists–Jeff Novak, GC of AOL Paid Services; John Lewis Jr., senior managing counsel, compliance, at The Coca-Cola Co. and InsideCounsel Driving Diversity columnist; and Steve Kaplan, GC of Connextions Inc.–immediately launched into a lively discussion, providing valuable insight about what they want from their firms. The conversation covered topics such as collaboration and communication with their outside counsel, the importance of industry expertise by lawyers working on their matters, and ways firms can market their services better.
But one of the most engaging portions of the discussion was about the importance of diversity. During the planning stage for the panel, we asked the in-house counsel if diversity was a requirement when hiring law firms. “Diversity isn't a requirement–that's like saying quality is a requirement,” Lewis immediately responded. “It's about having good professional instincts.” During the panel discussion, the in-house counsel confirmed this belief.
More than ever, clients are looking to their firms to bring the best ideas and solutions to the table. The most effective way to do this is by organizing truly diverse teams to work directly on their clients' matters. It's about building teams that represent the world we live in.
There is no question about the importance the in-house legal world has placed on diversity. But the needle hasn't moved enough in the past 10 years. Law firms and companies continue to struggle in this area.
In this issue's cover story (“Pipeline Priority”), InsideCounsel takes a look at how several organizations are working to cultivate the next generation of diverse lawyers. They believe in working from the bottom up–looking for diversity at the law school level is already too late. Programs are reaching as far back as high school, even elementary school, to prepare students for a future in law.
Diversity in law may be moving slowly, but thanks to the organizations and individuals who are truly making diversity their mission, the in-house bar will one day be representative of our nation's diverse population.
Recently, I had the privilege–along with InsideCounsel Publisher Tom Duggan–to moderate a panel of senior-level in-house counsel at the Legal Marketing Association's annual conference this year in Orlando, Fla. The title of the discussion was “Achieving Greater Collaboration: Getting a Win-Win Relationship with In-House Counsel.” The audience was a large group of law firm chief marketing officers, managers and other legal marketing professionals.
The three panelists–Jeff Novak, GC of AOL Paid Services; John
But one of the most engaging portions of the discussion was about the importance of diversity. During the planning stage for the panel, we asked the in-house counsel if diversity was a requirement when hiring law firms. “Diversity isn't a requirement–that's like saying quality is a requirement,”
More than ever, clients are looking to their firms to bring the best ideas and solutions to the table. The most effective way to do this is by organizing truly diverse teams to work directly on their clients' matters. It's about building teams that represent the world we live in.
There is no question about the importance the in-house legal world has placed on diversity. But the needle hasn't moved enough in the past 10 years. Law firms and companies continue to struggle in this area.
In this issue's cover story (“Pipeline Priority”), InsideCounsel takes a look at how several organizations are working to cultivate the next generation of diverse lawyers. They believe in working from the bottom up–looking for diversity at the law school level is already too late. Programs are reaching as far back as high school, even elementary school, to prepare students for a future in law.
Diversity in law may be moving slowly, but thanks to the organizations and individuals who are truly making diversity their mission, the in-house bar will one day be representative of our nation's diverse population.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom Reluctant Lawyer to Legal Trailblazer: Agiloft's GC on Redefining In-House Counsel With Innovation and Tech
7 minute readLegal Tech's Predictions for Legal Ops & In-House in 2025
Trending Stories
- 1FTX One Year Later: The Impact on Examiner Practice in Bankruptcy Courts
- 2Gen AI Legal Contract Startup Ivo Announces $16 Million Series A Funding Round
- 3DOJ's Flawed Thinking in Challenging HPE-Juniper Merger
- 4Annual Self-Check: Testing For Bias On The Bench
- 5'None of Us Like It': How Expedited Summer Associate Recruiting Affects Law Students and the Firms Hiring Them
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250