Tennessee makes effort to curb illegal immigration
Tennessee has joined the movement to curtail the flight of illegal immigrants by passing its own employment eligibility verification law, according to a document released by Jackson Lewis LLP.
June 14, 2011 at 07:32 AM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Tennessee has joined the movement to curtail the flight of illegal immigrants by passing its own employment eligibility verification law, according to a document released by Jackson Lewis LLP.
The Tennessee Lawful Employment Act (SB 1669, HB 1378), signed by Governor Bill Haslam on June 7, will require employers to use an E-verify program.
Employers will be required to enroll in the free federal program prior to hiring an employee to verify employees' work authorization status, as well as maintain records of any results related to that employee.
As an alternative to using the verification system, employers may request and retain documents such as a valid Tennessee driver license or photo ID—or that of another state if the issuance requirements are as strict as Tennessee; an official birth certificate, or a U.S. government-issued certified birth certificate; a valid passport and other documents.
But, if an employer chooses to enroll in E-verify, it must use the program for all new-hires, regardless of if it chooses to obtain one of the approved documents.
Employers also must verify non-employees, such as outside contractors and laborers, and request and retain one of the documents listed above for verification.
There are consequences for violating the law, depending on if it's a first or subsequent violation, and fines can range from $500 to $2,500. If a first violation is deemed to be made unknowingly, the employer will have 60 days to correct the issue before any further action is taken. However, if a final order is issued, the employer must pay all fines imposed and submit evidence of compliance within 60 days of the final order. Failure to do so may result in the employer's business license being revoked.
Governmental entities and private employers with at least 500 employees must comply with the law beginning January 1, 2012.
Private employers with 200-499 employees must comply beginning July 1, 2012. Any employer with 5-199 employees must comply beginning January 1, 2013.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAntitrust in Trump 2.0: Expect Gap Filling from State Attorneys General
6 minute readJohn Deere Annual Meeting Offers Peek Into DEI Strife That Looms for Companies Nationwide
7 minute readUp-and-Comer Scores First Legal Chief Post With Baltimore Orioles, the Team He Cheered for as Kid
Trending Stories
- 1Gen AI and Associate Legal Writing: Davis Wright Tremaine's New Training Model
- 2Departing Attorneys Sue Their Former Law Firm
- 3Pa. High Court: Concrete Proof Not Needed to Weigh Grounds for Preliminary Injunction Order
- 4'Something Else Is Coming': DOGE Established, but With Limited Scope
- 5Polsinelli Picks Up Corporate Health Care Partner From Greenberg Traurig in LA
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250