ePrize GC Gabe Karp Wins Top Honor
GC of online interactive promotions company has turned legal department into a profit center.
July 31, 2011 at 08:00 PM
4 minute read
It was 2004 when Gabe Karp joined ePrize, an online interactive promotions company, as its general counsel and executive vice president. Before Karp, the company's legal team consisted of one person, who handled the company's work from his private practice. As the era of text messaging and social media began to unfold, ePrize's clientele increased and the company needed a full-time legal team. Today, ePrize's legal department consists of nine people and has managed to keep the company out of legal trouble. In May, Karp was named Crain's Detroit Business' Top General Counsel for privately held companies under $1 billion due to his success with ePrize.
Karp says that when he started at ePrize, the company was just beginning to take advantage of new channels.
“Back then,” he says, “the Internet itself hadn't really been adopted by mainstream business. Text messaging was a big thing in 2004 and 2005, so we were running campaigns and launching them for some of the largest companies in the world through channels in which no one had drafted any laws.”
Under Karp's leadership, ePrize has turned its legal department from a cost center to a profit center. The company also provides legal services to its clients if claims are brought against their promotions. “We've run over 6,000 promotions in 45 countries and have had zero claims brought against them,” Karp says. “The job that was put to me was, 'Hey, we're going to do very cutting-edge things that no one has done before. We better not get sued because if we do, it's your fault.' I knew at the end of the day, if it was one guy holding the bag, it was going to be me.”
Because engaging customers through mobile and media channels, such as mobile-optimized websites and apps, has become a popular marketing tactic, Karp says it's likely more regulation and legislation for these channels will be adopted. “It's certainly been a challenge for me,” he says about keeping up with legislation regarding the ever-changing technology. “Certainly, there's a lot of risk at the end of the day, but it's the kind of thing that makes you kick off the sheets in the morning and come to work.”
It was 2004 when Gabe Karp joined ePrize, an online interactive promotions company, as its general counsel and executive vice president. Before Karp, the company's legal team consisted of one person, who handled the company's work from his private practice. As the era of text messaging and social media began to unfold, ePrize's clientele increased and the company needed a full-time legal team. Today, ePrize's legal department consists of nine people and has managed to keep the company out of legal trouble. In May, Karp was named Crain's Detroit Business' Top General Counsel for privately held companies under $1 billion due to his success with ePrize.
Karp says that when he started at ePrize, the company was just beginning to take advantage of new channels.
“Back then,” he says, “the Internet itself hadn't really been adopted by mainstream business. Text messaging was a big thing in 2004 and 2005, so we were running campaigns and launching them for some of the largest companies in the world through channels in which no one had drafted any laws.”
Under Karp's leadership, ePrize has turned its legal department from a cost center to a profit center. The company also provides legal services to its clients if claims are brought against their promotions. “We've run over 6,000 promotions in 45 countries and have had zero claims brought against them,” Karp says. “The job that was put to me was, 'Hey, we're going to do very cutting-edge things that no one has done before. We better not get sued because if we do, it's your fault.' I knew at the end of the day, if it was one guy holding the bag, it was going to be me.”
Because engaging customers through mobile and media channels, such as mobile-optimized websites and apps, has become a popular marketing tactic, Karp says it's likely more regulation and legislation for these channels will be adopted. “It's certainly been a challenge for me,” he says about keeping up with legislation regarding the ever-changing technology. “Certainly, there's a lot of risk at the end of the day, but it's the kind of thing that makes you kick off the sheets in the morning and come to work.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The Unheard of Superpower': How Women's Soft Skills Can Drive Success in Negotiations
Want to Get Ahead in Your Career? Find a Truth Teller
Ex-eBay CLO Tells WIPL Attendees: You Can Toot Your Own Horn and 'Still Be a Humble Person'
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Greenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
- 5Data-Driven Legal Strategies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250