Morrison on Metrics: 16 digital definitions
Examining the numerous numerical terms that legal departments use every day.
August 15, 2011 at 09:09 AM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Lawyers put great stock in precision. In recognition of that, this column defines a raft of terms that apply to numbers. Not a raft, actually, but exactly 16 concepts and words.
Working from the broadest term down, let's start with data (the plural of datum), used for individual facts or pieces of information. Information theory defines a binary digit (bit) as either 1 or 0, and strings of bits can encode or describe any data. A tiny portion of the data universe consists of numbers, “mathematical units, as in a numerical series, having precise relations with other such units.” Six patents convey an even number, and 3.14, known as pi, also is a number.
Only a tiny set of numbers are digits—whole numbers from one to nine. We record digits as figures, e.g., the symbol “3,” and digits more broadly as “an amount or value expressed in numbers.”
To determine numbers in a law department, there are various processes available. Most simply, you can count, which is to check over a group incrementally increasing by one to determine the total. A sibling of count is the term enumerate, but that mostly used for small numbers of items in lists. Or you can measure, where you ascertain the extent, dimension or quantity of something typically by comparison with a standard. The standard of months, for example, measures the elapsed duration of a case. Law departments most commonly report sums. How many non-disclosure agreements did we review last quarter, as you total them up?
Mathematics helps us work with numbers. The simplest function is addition, which gives an amount: “the sum total of two or more quantities.” For instance, when you count your filing cabinets one by one, the aggregate of two or more numbers is determined by addition. It is the result of a count or estimate in which the units are considered as individuals. Although the word statistic has a dictionary definition of “a numerical fact or datum,” the more precise use relates to mathematical processes that can organize and make statements or inferences about groups of numbers.
Whatever the process, a legal department determines values—a magnitude, quantity or number represented by a figure or symbol (e.g., “π”). The sentence, “The settlement required $10,000,” states a value for the settlement. For groups of values, we use the term quantity: “a particular, indefinite or considerable amount of anything.” It can be very specific—the quantity of waste released was 10,000 gallons; or looser—“a large quantity of backup tapes were discovered in the closet.”
Finally, buried in the fine print, an apology: It is sloppy to refer to a metric except in the context of poetic meter or the metric system (from the Greek metrikos, of or pertaining to measuring). The title of this column, Morrison on Metrics, betrays both rhyme and reason as well as my etymological ignorance.
Lawyers put great stock in precision. In recognition of that, this column defines a raft of terms that apply to numbers. Not a raft, actually, but exactly 16 concepts and words.
Working from the broadest term down, let's start with data (the plural of datum), used for individual facts or pieces of information. Information theory defines a binary digit (bit) as either 1 or 0, and strings of bits can encode or describe any data. A tiny portion of the data universe consists of numbers, “mathematical units, as in a numerical series, having precise relations with other such units.” Six patents convey an even number, and 3.14, known as pi, also is a number.
Only a tiny set of numbers are digits—whole numbers from one to nine. We record digits as figures, e.g., the symbol “3,” and digits more broadly as “an amount or value expressed in numbers.”
To determine numbers in a law department, there are various processes available. Most simply, you can count, which is to check over a group incrementally increasing by one to determine the total. A sibling of count is the term enumerate, but that mostly used for small numbers of items in lists. Or you can measure, where you ascertain the extent, dimension or quantity of something typically by comparison with a standard. The standard of months, for example, measures the elapsed duration of a case. Law departments most commonly report sums. How many non-disclosure agreements did we review last quarter, as you total them up?
Mathematics helps us work with numbers. The simplest function is addition, which gives an amount: “the sum total of two or more quantities.” For instance, when you count your filing cabinets one by one, the aggregate of two or more numbers is determined by addition. It is the result of a count or estimate in which the units are considered as individuals. Although the word statistic has a dictionary definition of “a numerical fact or datum,” the more precise use relates to mathematical processes that can organize and make statements or inferences about groups of numbers.
Whatever the process, a legal department determines values—a magnitude, quantity or number represented by a figure or symbol (e.g., “pi”). The sentence, “The settlement required $10,000,” states a value for the settlement. For groups of values, we use the term quantity: “a particular, indefinite or considerable amount of anything.” It can be very specific—the quantity of waste released was 10,000 gallons; or looser—“a large quantity of backup tapes were discovered in the closet.”
Finally, buried in the fine print, an apology: It is sloppy to refer to a metric except in the context of poetic meter or the metric system (from the Greek metrikos, of or pertaining to measuring). The title of this column, Morrison on Metrics, betrays both rhyme and reason as well as my etymological ignorance.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawyers Drowning in Cases Are Embracing AI Fastest—and Say It's Yielding Better Outcomes for Clients
GC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
8 minute readWhy ACLU's New Legal Director Says It's a 'Good Time to Take the Reins'
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250