Village People frontman in “Y.M.C.A.” copyright fight
You dont have to have been born in the 1970s to be familiar with the disco hit Y.M.C.A. by the famously flamboyant music group the Village People. Now, the popular (and some would argue, annoying) song is now at the forefront of a legal battle that could test the boundaries...
August 19, 2011 at 07:52 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
You don't have to have been born in the 1970s to be familiar with the disco hit “Y.M.C.A.” by the famously flamboyant music group the Village People. Now, the popular (and some would argue, annoying) song is now at the forefront of a legal battle that could test the boundaries of copyright law.
Village People lead singer Victor Willis, who wrote the lyrics to “Y.M.C.A.”, recently filed papers to obtain his share of ownership of the hit song as well as 32 other Village People compositions. Willis and other music artists who created albums in the '70s are seeking ownership of their work through a provision that was incorporated into U.S. copyright law in the mid-'70s that allows artists to reclaim the rights to their work after 35 years.
However, two companies—Scorpio Music and Can't Stop Productions—aren't so willing to turn over the songs' rights to Willis. The companies contend that they employed Willis as a writer for hire and, therefore, because he was an independent contractor, he shouldn't have ownership of the songs. Additionally, the companies say they personally created the Village People as a concept group that they controlled, which is different from the other musicians and bands of the '70s.
You don't have to have been born in the 1970s to be familiar with the disco hit “Y.M.C.A.” by the famously flamboyant music group the Village People. Now, the popular (and some would argue, annoying) song is now at the forefront of a legal battle that could test the boundaries of copyright law.
Village People lead singer Victor Willis, who wrote the lyrics to “Y.M.C.A.”, recently filed papers to obtain his share of ownership of the hit song as well as 32 other Village People compositions. Willis and other music artists who created albums in the '70s are seeking ownership of their work through a provision that was incorporated into U.S. copyright law in the mid-'70s that allows artists to reclaim the rights to their work after 35 years.
However, two companies—Scorpio Music and Can't Stop Productions—aren't so willing to turn over the songs' rights to Willis. The companies contend that they employed Willis as a writer for hire and, therefore, because he was an independent contractor, he shouldn't have ownership of the songs. Additionally, the companies say they personally created the Village People as a concept group that they controlled, which is different from the other musicians and bands of the '70s.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhat to Know About the New 'Overlapping Directorship' Antitrust Development
4 minute readThe Met Hires GC of Elite University as Next Legal Chief
Tesla, Musk Appeal Chancery Compensation Case to Delaware Supreme Court
2 minute readTurning Over Legal Tedium to AI Requires Lots of Unglamorous Work on Front End
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1SDNY US Attorney Damian Williams Lands at Paul Weiss
- 2Litigators of the Week: A Knockout Blow to Latest FCC Net Neutrality Rules After ‘Loper Bright’
- 3Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 4Norton Rose Sues South Africa Government Over Ethnicity Score System
- 5KMPG Wants to Provide Legal Services in the US. Now All Eyes Are on Their Big Four Peers
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250