FTC challenges hospital merger
The Obama administration frequently touts the advantages of its comprehensive health care reform law, including the benefits that doctors and hospitals can reap when they partner to provide better care at lower costs.
August 22, 2011 at 08:47 AM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The Obama administration frequently touts the advantages of its comprehensive health care reform law, including the benefits that doctors and hospitals can reap when they partner to provide better care at lower costs. However, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is challenging one such merger in Toledo, Ohio, alleging it is anti-competitive and would increase health care costs.
ProMedica Health System and St. Luke's Hospital agreed on a merger in August 2010 in order to provide collaborative, efficient and cost-effective care to patients, which is one of the main goals of the health care reform. The FTC, however, says the merger would increase ProMedica's market share, which would allow it to force health insurance plans to pay higher rates to St. Luke's and its 11 other hospitals in Ohio and Michigan. Higher rates would result in higher premiums and co-payments for consumers.
The case underscores the murkiness of the FTC's guidelines about how antitrust enforcement agencies will treat merged health providers.
The Obama administration frequently touts the advantages of its comprehensive health care reform law, including the benefits that doctors and hospitals can reap when they partner to provide better care at lower costs. However, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is challenging one such merger in Toledo, Ohio, alleging it is anti-competitive and would increase health care costs.
ProMedica Health System and St. Luke's Hospital agreed on a merger in August 2010 in order to provide collaborative, efficient and cost-effective care to patients, which is one of the main goals of the health care reform. The FTC, however, says the merger would increase ProMedica's market share, which would allow it to force health insurance plans to pay higher rates to St. Luke's and its 11 other hospitals in Ohio and Michigan. Higher rates would result in higher premiums and co-payments for consumers.
The case underscores the murkiness of the FTC's guidelines about how antitrust enforcement agencies will treat merged health providers.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
What to Know About the New 'Overlapping Directorship' Antitrust Development
4 minute read
Turning Over Legal Tedium to AI Requires Lots of Unglamorous Work on Front End
6 minute read
Khan Defends FTC Tenure, Does Not Address Post-Inauguration Plans
Best Practices for Adopting and Adapting to AI: Mitigating Risk in Light of Increasing Regulatory and Shareholder Scrutiny
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1SDNY US Attorney Damian Williams Lands at Paul Weiss
- 2Litigators of the Week: A Knockout Blow to Latest FCC Net Neutrality Rules After ‘Loper Bright’
- 3Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 4Norton Rose Sues South Africa Government Over Ethnicity Score System
- 5KMPG Wants to Provide Legal Services in the US. Now All Eyes Are on Their Big Four Peers
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
