Non-profits welcome women
Women lawyers are seeing equal opportunity in the non-profit sector.
October 03, 2011 at 08:00 PM
4 minute read
The first person I wrote about for this column was a woman general counsel. Her name was Karen Lipton, and at the time she was the general counsel of the American Red Cross.
The column appeared in March 1992—nearly 20 years ago—and was only the second I had written for this magazine. Back then, I was on an epistolary journey in search of my peers who practiced at the non-profit bar. I was miffed that nearly all of the ink spilled about in-house counsel was on behalf of those working for the big for-profit corporations, and most of them were in New York or Chicago.
Almost never did I see the legal media pay attention to the many accomplished inhouse lawyers around the country who worked for non-profits, including the universities, hospitals, big charities and trade associations, despite the fact that the non-profit sector even then represented a huge chunk of our economy, as it still does. I set out to right the imbalance in these pages.
So, for many of those early columns I sought out various in-house counsel for some well-known and not-so-well-known non-profit organizations to feature them and their personal stories. As time went on, the column focused on a much broader array of topics involving us non-profit lawyers, and from time to time I would again feature the work and lives of other colleagues who caught my attention.
But until this column you are reading now, the gender of those colleagues was never a part of the story. Until the moment my editor suggested I focus on women non-profit counsel this month, I can honestly say that of all the subjects I ever considered for my attention in this space, that was not one of them. This is not to say, of course, that I think giving editorial attention to women corporate counsel is somehow inappropriate. It is to say, rather, that nothing in my 25 years experience as a non-profit in-house counsel ever caused me to think the fact of a woman general counsel was a particularly noteworthy subject. Given the sensitivities of these times I guess I must hasten to say that there are many women non-profit general counsel who deserve such attention and have done newsworthy things. Indeed, I've given them such attention myself (e.g., the aforementioned Karen Lipton and others). My point, which I hope is obvious, is that at least among us non-profit lawyers, a woman general counsel is a rather ordinary thing.
I don't have any statistics at hand to support what I'm about to say, but for as long as I've been a non-profit lawyer, I think at least half of my non-profit counsel colleagues, if not more, have been women. Even though the legal profession had been traditionally male-dominated, I was not surprised at the large proportion of female general counsel I encountered for at least three reasons. First, throughout my six years of law school (the late '70s and mid-'80s) half my classmates were women, so to see women holding the top legal jobs when I got out was not cognitively dissonant. Second, I was working in the cable television industry at the time, which was then and still is today very receptive to women at all levels, from CEO and below. In fact, before I even got to law school, the general counsel of the cable industry's trade association where I worked was a woman.
Finally, I've spent my entire career in the non-profit sector. The very nature of the sector tends to be attractive to women either because of its mission focus or because of its greater flexibility than the for-profit companies (and especially the tyranny of the billable hour of law firms) in accommodating career interruptions occasioned by motherhood.
So, I really don't have much of interest to say about women non-profit counsel, unless you think the ordinary is extraordinary.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readGC With Deep GM Experience Takes Legal Reins of Power Management Giant
2 minute readPreparing for 2025: Anticipated Policy Changes Affecting U.S. Businesses Under the Trump Administration
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250