Civil rights groups’ attempt to block Alabama immigration provisions denied
The Department of Justice (DOJ) and civil rights organizations filed a motion to request a block on certain provisions in Alabamas immigration law that has triggered a decline in thousands of Hispanic students from attending school in the state.
October 06, 2011 at 09:50 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The Department of Justice (DOJ) and civil rights organizations filed a motion to request a block on certain provisions in Alabama's immigration law that has triggered a decline in thousands of Hispanic students from attending school in the state.
The request follows a ruling from last week in which U.S. District Judge Sharon Blackburn upheld significant sections of Alabama's immigration law that require schools to verify students' immigration status prior to enrollment and allows police officers to arrest individuals they suspect could be illegal immigrants during routine stops. These two contentious provisions have sparked anger and fear since last week's ruling.
Judge Blackburn did compromise on some accounts and granted the Obama administration's request to block some elements of the law. She temporarily blocked provisions that made it a crime to transport or harbor illegal immigrants, and restricted illegal immigrants from searching for and performing work, until a final ruling at a later date.
After more than 2,000 Hispanic students missed school this Monday, Alabama's acting State Superintendent of Education, Larry Craven, released a statement Tuesday saying that although the state's law requires students to present their birth certificates at the time of enrollment, all students will be admitted to academic classes and extra-curricular activities in the school system, regardless of if they have a copy of their certificate.
Civil rights organizations, including the Southern Poverty Law Center, plan to file an emergency request with the 11th Circuit to block the law, pending the outcome of the DOJ's appeal of Judge Blackburn's ruling.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) and civil rights organizations filed a motion to request a block on certain provisions in Alabama's immigration law that has triggered a decline in thousands of Hispanic students from attending school in the state.
The request follows a ruling from last week in which U.S. District Judge Sharon Blackburn upheld significant sections of Alabama's immigration law that require schools to verify students' immigration status prior to enrollment and allows police officers to arrest individuals they suspect could be illegal immigrants during routine stops. These two contentious provisions have sparked anger and fear since last week's ruling.
Judge Blackburn did compromise on some accounts and granted the Obama administration's request to block some elements of the law. She temporarily blocked provisions that made it a crime to transport or harbor illegal immigrants, and restricted illegal immigrants from searching for and performing work, until a final ruling at a later date.
After more than 2,000 Hispanic students missed school this Monday, Alabama's acting State Superintendent of Education, Larry Craven, released a statement Tuesday saying that although the state's law requires students to present their birth certificates at the time of enrollment, all students will be admitted to academic classes and extra-curricular activities in the school system, regardless of if they have a copy of their certificate.
Civil rights organizations, including the Southern Poverty Law Center, plan to file an emergency request with the 11th Circuit to block the law, pending the outcome of the DOJ's appeal of Judge Blackburn's ruling.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
5 minute readIn-House Lawyers Are Focused on Employment and Cybersecurity Disputes, But Looking Out for Conflict Over AI
Trending Stories
- 1Orrick Loses 10-Lawyer Team to Herbert Smith in Germany
- 2‘The US Market Is Critical’: KPMG’s Former Head of Global Legal Services On the Legal Arm of the Big Four Firm Entering the US
- 3Justice Marguerite Grays Elevated to Co-Chair Panel That Advises on Commercial Division
- 4McDermott Continues UK Growth With Another Partner Hire in London
- 52 Texas Lawyers Vie for Prominent Post: 2025-2026 Election
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250