3 keys to effective records management programs
Successful implementation can be found in three simple lettersPPT.
October 12, 2011 at 06:57 AM
9 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
In my previous articles, I have talked about cleaning out unnecessary electronically stored information (ESI) and developing an effective records retention program. Now, I'd like to turn to execution. A records management policy and records retention schedule are worth little more than the bits and bytes they are made up of unless you actually implement them. And the key to successful implementation can be found in three simple letters—PPT: people, process and technology.
1. People
Yes, records management would be a whole lot easier if we could just eliminate the humans. But people are going to continue creating, saving, sending and deleting ESI for now, so the success of your records management program requires that you get them on board. People are important in two key respects: First, they have to understand the records management program and their responsibilities under it. Second, their role has to be as simple and undisruptive as is possible if you want them to comply.
Understanding and acceptance come through training. Formal training is important not only to help employees understand the records management program, but also because it reinforces the fact that the program is a priority. Employees should be trained when they are hired, whenever the program is significantly updated and on a periodic basis thereafter. If possible, the training should be interactive and include a testing component to increase the likelihood that information will be retained.
Compliance, however, requires more than simply understanding the program and its expectations. If the expectations are unreasonable, the result will be equally bad. Therefore, it will be important to simplify the process for individual custodians as much as possible by simplifying records classifications, reducing the number of decisions to be made and leveraging technology where possible.
2. Process
Before you can properly train people, you need to develop and document your processes. A policy provides overall direction. Schedules provide guidance for specific records. Process enables execution.
The records management process must include detailed procedures for how individual employees will execute the records management program as well as necessary reference materials. Among other things, you will need to have a file plan for unstructured data, including email. You will need to establish procedures for individual custodians to follow when categorizing records within your information systems. IT stewards of non-custodial data repositories also will require procedures for managing data in such systems.
The complete set of processes and procedures will be dependent on your business' information environment, and is far beyond the scope of this article, but it is a critical component of success. As I've mentioned before, don't let the sheer scope of the endeavor stop you from starting. Begin, if you need to, with a single information system, and move on from there.
3. Technology
I've said it before and I'll say it here again: technology is not a panacea. There is no easy button, so don't think you can dump records management onto the collective lap of IT and walk away. That being said, technology will be a critical, indispensible and unavoidable component of the program. The mantra for technology should be: Leverage what you have, acquire what you need, and retire or repurpose what you don't.
The technologies that we use each and every day (such as the email system that delivered you notification that this article had posted on InsideCounsel) are fabulous and have far more powerful records management capabilities than we tend to use.
Still, it is quite possible that you'll at least consider new technology to support your program. There are many excellent technologies in this rapidly developing space, and, happily, vendors are being increasingly creative in how technology is delivered and partnering with customers to help reduce the overall cost of ownership. Cloud-based solutions are just one emerging example of this.
You also are likely using technologies that you either don't need or shouldn't be using. Sometimes these are “rogue” applications such as IM clients employees have downloaded and legacy systems no longer in use but still housing data. What you have remains to be seen, but it is there and you should get rid of it.
Conclusion
I have come to believe that people, process and technology are central components of the solution to just about every business problem, and records management is no exception. The success of your solution will depend on the attention you give to each of these components.
In my previous articles, I have talked about cleaning out unnecessary electronically stored information (ESI) and developing an effective records retention program. Now, I'd like to turn to execution. A records management policy and records retention schedule are worth little more than the bits and bytes they are made up of unless you actually implement them. And the key to successful implementation can be found in three simple letters—PPT: people, process and technology.
1. People
Yes, records management would be a whole lot easier if we could just eliminate the humans. But people are going to continue creating, saving, sending and deleting ESI for now, so the success of your records management program requires that you get them on board. People are important in two key respects: First, they have to understand the records management program and their responsibilities under it. Second, their role has to be as simple and undisruptive as is possible if you want them to comply.
Understanding and acceptance come through training. Formal training is important not only to help employees understand the records management program, but also because it reinforces the fact that the program is a priority. Employees should be trained when they are hired, whenever the program is significantly updated and on a periodic basis thereafter. If possible, the training should be interactive and include a testing component to increase the likelihood that information will be retained.
Compliance, however, requires more than simply understanding the program and its expectations. If the expectations are unreasonable, the result will be equally bad. Therefore, it will be important to simplify the process for individual custodians as much as possible by simplifying records classifications, reducing the number of decisions to be made and leveraging technology where possible.
2. Process
Before you can properly train people, you need to develop and document your processes. A policy provides overall direction. Schedules provide guidance for specific records. Process enables execution.
The records management process must include detailed procedures for how individual employees will execute the records management program as well as necessary reference materials. Among other things, you will need to have a file plan for unstructured data, including email. You will need to establish procedures for individual custodians to follow when categorizing records within your information systems. IT stewards of non-custodial data repositories also will require procedures for managing data in such systems.
The complete set of processes and procedures will be dependent on your business' information environment, and is far beyond the scope of this article, but it is a critical component of success. As I've mentioned before, don't let the sheer scope of the endeavor stop you from starting. Begin, if you need to, with a single information system, and move on from there.
3. Technology
I've said it before and I'll say it here again: technology is not a panacea. There is no easy button, so don't think you can dump records management onto the collective lap of IT and walk away. That being said, technology will be a critical, indispensible and unavoidable component of the program. The mantra for technology should be: Leverage what you have, acquire what you need, and retire or repurpose what you don't.
The technologies that we use each and every day (such as the email system that delivered you notification that this article had posted on InsideCounsel) are fabulous and have far more powerful records management capabilities than we tend to use.
Still, it is quite possible that you'll at least consider new technology to support your program. There are many excellent technologies in this rapidly developing space, and, happily, vendors are being increasingly creative in how technology is delivered and partnering with customers to help reduce the overall cost of ownership. Cloud-based solutions are just one emerging example of this.
You also are likely using technologies that you either don't need or shouldn't be using. Sometimes these are “rogue” applications such as IM clients employees have downloaded and legacy systems no longer in use but still housing data. What you have remains to be seen, but it is there and you should get rid of it.
Conclusion
I have come to believe that people, process and technology are central components of the solution to just about every business problem, and records management is no exception. The success of your solution will depend on the attention you give to each of these components.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Taps McKinsey CLO Pierre Gentin for Commerce Department GC
Fired NLRB Member Seeks Reinstatement, Challenges President's Removal Power
Upstart Insurer That's Wowing Industry Hires AIG Legal Exec to Help Guide Global Expansion
2 minute readGOP Now Holds FTC Gavel, but Dems Signal They'll Be a Rowdy Minority
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'A Shock to the System’: Some Government Attorneys Are Forced Out, While Others Weigh Job Options
- 2Lackawanna County Lawyer Fails to Shake Legal Mal Claims Over Sex With Client
- 3Florida Judge Denies Motion to Dismiss in $150M Plane Crash Lawsuit Involving Flow La Movie
- 4HSF Accounts Show US Operating Losses Last Year But Revenue Increased Slightly
- 5Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250