SEC finally issues private fund rules
Sometimes even the Securities and Exchange Commission can shock people. The commission yesterday unanimously voted to adopt new rules requiring certain hedge fund and private fund advisers to report confidential data to the government.
October 27, 2011 at 08:05 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Sometimes even the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) can shock people. The commission yesterday unanimously voted to adopt new rules requiring certain hedge fund and private fund advisers to report confidential data to the government.
The new reporting requirements come as a result of Sections 404 and 406 of the Dodd-Frank Act, which requires SEC-registered investment advisers with at least $150 million in private fund assets under management to periodically file a new, confidential reporting form—Form PF.
Data reported in the form will allow the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) to monitor a large portion of private fund assets while simultaneously reducing the reporting requirements for private fund advisers.
“The data collection form that we have adopted will address the dramatic lack of private fund information available to regulators today while easing the burden on private fund managers producing the data,” SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro said in a statement.
Many advisers are viewing the rules in a positive light. The reporting requirements were scaled back after the industry, lawmakers and even some former SEC commissioners carped about the regulations as they were initially proposed in January were too onerous, Reuters reports. As it stands, the final rule will apply to far fewer private fund advisers than initially expected, gives advisers more time to file their forms and, in certain instances, even requires specific advisers to file less frequently.
Compliance with the new rules will begin with a two-stage phase-in period. Most private fund advisers will be required to begin filing Form PF following the end of their first fiscal year or fiscal quarter on or after Dec. 15, 2012. Those with $5 billion or more in private fund assets must begin filing Form PF following the end of their first fiscal year or fiscal quarter on or after June 15, 2012.
For more reaction to the rules, read Reuters' coverage. For more specifics on Form PF, read the SEC's fact sheet.
Sometimes even the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) can shock people. The commission yesterday unanimously voted to adopt new rules requiring certain hedge fund and private fund advisers to report confidential data to the government.
The new reporting requirements come as a result of Sections 404 and 406 of the Dodd-Frank Act, which requires SEC-registered investment advisers with at least $150 million in private fund assets under management to periodically file a new, confidential reporting form—Form PF.
Data reported in the form will allow the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) to monitor a large portion of private fund assets while simultaneously reducing the reporting requirements for private fund advisers.
“The data collection form that we have adopted will address the dramatic lack of private fund information available to regulators today while easing the burden on private fund managers producing the data,” SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro said in a statement.
Many advisers are viewing the rules in a positive light. The reporting requirements were scaled back after the industry, lawmakers and even some former SEC commissioners carped about the regulations as they were initially proposed in January were too onerous, Reuters reports. As it stands, the final rule will apply to far fewer private fund advisers than initially expected, gives advisers more time to file their forms and, in certain instances, even requires specific advisers to file less frequently.
Compliance with the new rules will begin with a two-stage phase-in period. Most private fund advisers will be required to begin filing Form PF following the end of their first fiscal year or fiscal quarter on or after Dec. 15, 2012. Those with $5 billion or more in private fund assets must begin filing Form PF following the end of their first fiscal year or fiscal quarter on or after June 15, 2012.
For more reaction to the rules, read Reuters' coverage. For more specifics on Form PF, read the SEC's fact sheet.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSenators Grill Visa, Mastercard Execs on Alleged Anticompetitive Practices, Fees
Trump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
Trump Likely to Keep Up Antitrust Enforcement, but Dial Back the Antagonism
5 minute readFTC Sues Cash-Advance Fintech Dave, Says It Deceives the 'Financially Vulnerable'
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250