MAPLE Act puts fake maple syrup makers in a sticky situation
Think back to the last time you had pancakes. You no doubt doused them in maple syrup, right? But was it real maple syrup?
October 28, 2011 at 06:48 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Think back to the last time you had pancakes. You no doubt doused them in maple syrup, right? But was it real maple syrup?
The question is a serious one for two New England senators, who are fed up with imitation maple syrup makers fooling consumers into thinking they're pouring authentic maple syrup on their breakfast items.
Last week Senators Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., and Susan Collins, R-Maine, introduced a bill called the Maple Agriculture Protection and Law Enforcement Act, or MAPLE Act, which would punish syrup makers who try to pass their imitation products off as real maple syrup.
“I have been alarmed by the growing number of individuals and businesses claiming to sell Vermont maple syrup when they are in fact selling an inferior product that is not maple syrup at all,” Sen. Leahy said in a statement.
The MAPLE Act, which aims to increase consumer confidence and protect the economic livelihood of New England's maple syrup makers, would make the sale of fake maple syrup a felony that could send offenders to prison for up to five years.
According to CNN, the sale of fraudulent maple syrup is currently only a misdemeanor, with the maximum punishment set at one year in prison.
Think back to the last time you had pancakes. You no doubt doused them in maple syrup, right? But was it real maple syrup?
The question is a serious one for two New England senators, who are fed up with imitation maple syrup makers fooling consumers into thinking they're pouring authentic maple syrup on their breakfast items.
Last week Senators Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., and Susan Collins, R-Maine, introduced a bill called the Maple Agriculture Protection and Law Enforcement Act, or MAPLE Act, which would punish syrup makers who try to pass their imitation products off as real maple syrup.
“I have been alarmed by the growing number of individuals and businesses claiming to sell Vermont maple syrup when they are in fact selling an inferior product that is not maple syrup at all,” Sen. Leahy said in a statement.
The MAPLE Act, which aims to increase consumer confidence and protect the economic livelihood of New England's maple syrup makers, would make the sale of fake maple syrup a felony that could send offenders to prison for up to five years.
According to CNN, the sale of fraudulent maple syrup is currently only a misdemeanor, with the maximum punishment set at one year in prison.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Khan Defends FTC Tenure, Does Not Address Post-Inauguration Plans
Best Practices for Adopting and Adapting to AI: Mitigating Risk in Light of Increasing Regulatory and Shareholder Scrutiny
7 minute read
Crypto Groups Sue IRS Over Decentralized Finance Reporting Rule
SEC Penalizes Wells Fargo, LPL Financial $900,000 Each for Inaccurate Trading Data
Trending Stories
- 1Adapting to AI and the Needs of Lawyers Will Be Key For Shutts & Bowen, Says Incoming Ft. Lauderdale Leader
- 2What Qualities Will Distinguish Good from Great Service In 2025?
- 3The Met Hires GC of Elite University as Next Legal Chief
- 4Not Here: Court Finds Texas Has No Jurisdiction Over Google
- 5Lawyer's Retirement Benefits Excluded From Marital Property
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
