Governors go after large salaries and benefits given to non-profits
There currently are no rules governing executive pay at state-funded charities, but there may be soon
October 31, 2011 at 08:00 PM
7 minute read
As the economy continues to stagnate, state governors are looking for and finding “gold in them thar hills” of the non-profit sector. A couple months ago, I noted that Gov. Jerry Brown of California and Gov. Peter Shumlin of Vermont each came out strongly against outrageous compensation packages given to executives of their respective tax-supported state universities. They acted using their state authority without giving any attention at all to the IRS, which can't seem to figure out how much is too much to pay a charity executive.
Since then, with a little help from the New York Times and no help at all from the IRS, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo used his executive power to go after large salaries and benefits given to state-supported charities. He was inspired to act by a Times article documenting the huge sums paid out to what a whistleblower called the “Medicaid moguls”—charity executives of non-profits that get as much as 95 percent of their revenues from the state to serve Medicaid patients. Cuomo immediately put together a task force that already has sent out letters to hundreds of state non-profits demanding details on executive pay.
The immediate focus was on two brothers, Philip and Joel Levy, who led the Young Adult Institute, a Medicaid-funded non-profit. They each paid themselves close to $1 million yearly, and even were allowed to bill the charity for their children's college educations. One of them charged the charity $50,400 for his daughter's living expenses while she was in school. Curiously, they both quit in June after getting inquiries from a reporter. The Times also reported on the head of Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center who was paid $8.4 million.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAt WIPL, Venus Williams Shares How to Find Inspiration, Rein in Self-Doubt
Legal Speak at Women, Influence and Power Conference 2024: Lakeshia Ekeigwe
1 minute readAre Lead Attorney Relationships More Important Now Than Law Firm Brands?
7 minute readNorfolk Southern Replaces Fired CLO With Fast-Rising Internal Candidate
Trending Stories
- 1'I'm Staying Everything': Texas Bankruptcy Judge Halts Talc Trials Against J&J
- 2What We Know About the Kentucky Judge Killed in His Chambers
- 3Judge Blasts Authors' Lawyers in Key AI Suit, Says Case Doomed Without Upgraded Team
- 4Ex-Prosecutor and Judge Fatally Shot During Attempted Arrest on Federal Corruption Charges
- 5Federal Judge Won't Stop Title IX Investigation Into Former GMU Law Professor
Who Got The Work
Burr & Forman partner Garry K. Grooms has entered an appearance for 4M Acquisitions and Wallace D. Tweden in a pending environmental lawsuit. The action, filed July 22 in Tennessee Middle District Court by the McKellar Law Group and Mark E. Martin LLC on behalf of Tennessee Riverkeeper, contends that the defendant's violated the Clean Water Act and Tennessee Water Quality Control Act by allowing for the discharge of pollutants into waters of the U.S. without obtaining a National Pollutant Discharge permit. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Aleta A. Trauger, is 3:24-cv-00886, Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Tweden et al.
Who Got The Work
Ramsey M. Al-Salam, Gene W. Lee and Stevan R. Stark of Perkins Coie have entered appearances for R-Pac International in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The case, filed Aug. 12 in New York Southern District Court by PinilisHalpern LLP and Friedman Suder & Cooke on behalf of Adasa Inc, asserts a single patent related to wireless sensors used for tagging products. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein, is 1:24-cv-06102, Adasa Inc. v. R-Pac International LLC.
Who Got The Work
Walmart has tapped lawyer Nicole M. Wright of Zausmer PC to defend a pending product liability lawsuit. The action was filed Aug. 12 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Wolfe Trial Lawyers on behalf of a plaintiff claiming burns from a defective propane tank. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Matthew F. Leitman, is 2:24-cv-12100, Hill v. Ferrellgas, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Kevin Simpson and James Randall of Winston & Strawn have stepped in to represent Comcast in a pending consumer class action. The case, filed Aug. 11 in Georgia Northern District Court by Kaufman PA, contends that the defendant placed pre-recorded debt collection phone calls to the plaintiff in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge J.P. Boulee, is 1:24-cv-03553, Pond v. Comcast Cable Communications LLC.
Who Got The Work
Potter Anderson & Corroon partners Christopher N. Kelly and Kevin R. Shannon have stepped in to represent cloud computing company Fastly and its top executives in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 23 in Delaware District Court by deLeeuw Law and Bragar Eagel & Squire on behalf of Mark Sweitzer, accuses the defendant of failing to disclose that revenue growth in 2023 was primarily driven by a 'consolidation trend' in which companies simplified operations by reducing the number of content delivery network vendors under management, thereby reducing competition and increasing the defendant's market share. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gregory B. Williams, is 1:24-cv-00969, Sweitzer v. Nightingale et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250