Managing tablet computers in the workplace
The rise of tablets has prompted interesting questions about how companies should handle device distribution and legislate usage.
November 30, 2011 at 07:00 PM
3 minute read
The demand for tablet computers seems to be rising by the day. After a relatively short time on the market, employees have quickly realized that they can now combine their personal and business interests and needs all in one handy, portable device, and now are looking for support.
With mounting sales of the iPad 2, Kindle Fire and tablet/phone hybrid Samsung Galaxy Note, companies are now faced with the conundrum of how to govern the purchase and distribution of these devices. Some companies seem content to purchase their own tablets and disseminate them to their employees as they see fit, while others will offer a stipend or reimburse employees should they choose to buy one. And some companies have no plan in place at all.
“There's no firm rule,” says Andrew Siegel, vice president and assistant general counsel in CBS' law department. He says certain lawyers in his department have requested to have devices they personally purchased put on the system, while the general counsel also bought iPads for a few people to test and see if there was a business use.
Siegel believes tablet distribution and management should fall under most companies' standard IT guidelines, just like if an employee has a personal cell phone that they use for business. And the same goes for when the company owns the device.
“If you've got a company-issued device and you use it for personal and such, it's subject to company's IT policy and you will treat it accordingly,” he says.
Another issue for employers to iron out is how to handle employees who use their devices for both personal and business purposes. Similar to when the iPhone was first released, many employees have begun to clamor for their employers to support business use of the device before legal teams have drawn up effective usage policies.
“The question is, 'How do you protect the integrity of the business connections and security of that information while giving people the flexibility to use it for gaming, personal banking, news, pictures and music?'” asks Levenfeld Pearlstein Executive Director Angela Hickey. “That's a challenge. But because of the technology, it's not insurmountable—it just needs to be addressed.”
At Hickey's Chicago-based law firm, she says the attorneys are on their own when it comes to the personal stuff.
“It's incumbent on them to synch with iTunes or iCloud or however else they keep up with their personal apps, but we don't get involved in that at all,” she says.
But Levenfeld Pearlstein may be ahead of the pack when it comes to managing this dynamic.
“I don't think a lot of people have thought about this yet,” Siegel says.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
How Qualcomm’s General Counsel Is Championing Diversity in Innovation
6 minute readRepublican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
4 minute readFTC Lauds Withdrawal of Proposed Indiana Hospitals Merger After Leaning on State Regulators
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250