10 of the strangest lawsuits making headlines
The following lawsuits exemplify the lighter, and sometimes bizarre, side of the legal world.
December 14, 2011 at 07:20 AM
8 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Bothersome Burping
After a 13-year-old boy in Albuquerque, N.M., allegedly “burped audibly” in class, his teacher called a school resource officer and complained the boy was disrupting her lesson. The seventh grader was then promptly handcuffed and carted off to juvenile detention, according to a civil rights lawsuit filed against an Albuquerque school principal, a teacher and a city police officer.
According to the lawsuit, “Criminalizing of the burping of a thirteen-year-old boy serves no governmental purpose. Burping is not a serious disruption.” During a risk assessment given by the jail staff, the boy scored a -2 on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being extremely dangerous. Therefore, he was never charged for his burping.
Family Feud
Reggae king Bob Marley's widow, Rita Marley, and nine children are suing his half brother, Richard Booker, over Booker's use of the Marley name to promote an annual Miami music festival and gather profits from businesses in Jamaica. Filed at the end of November, the suit claims Booker violated copyright and trademark laws by using Marley's name, photographs, lyrics and symbols, which could deceive customers into thinking they are endorsed by Marley's family. The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages, as well as an end to using Marley-related references.
Tormenting Toothache
A 42-year-old man filed a class-action lawsuit against his dentist over an anti-defamation contract she made him sign when he saw her because of a bad toothache. The contract prohibited Robert Lee from posting negative reviews and comments online about his dentist, Stacy Makhnevich, and allegedly gave her copyright ownership of critical posts.
Though Lee said thought little of the contract at first, he later found that Makhnevich had overcharged him by about $4,000 and submitted his records to the wrong insurance company. Lee posted complaints, which prompted Makhnevich to demand their removal and threaten to sue Lee for infringing on her copyright provisions. According to the suit, she began sending $100 invoices for fines every day to Lee, who incurred about $4,600 worth of fees.
“It is outrageous that a patient would have to sign away his constitutionally protected right to get treatment for a toothache,” said Paul Alan Levy, the lawyer representing Lee. The suit is seeking to end all such gag patient contracts.
Noisy Madonna
Pop superstar Madonna settled a lawsuit with her neighbor, Karen George, who claimed the singer made too much noise in her New York City apartment-turned-rehearsal studio. According to the suit filed in 2009, George had enough of the “blaring music, stomping and shaking walls” that lasted about three hours every day and said she often left her apartment because the noise and vibrations were “unbearable.” Madonna attempted to lower the volume over the years, but ultimately decided to settle with George after efforts to dismiss the lawsuit in August were denied.
Jesse Dimmick / File photograph from The Topeka-Capital Journal
Confused Kidnapper
For most newlyweds, the week following the wedding means relaxing on a romantic honeymoon. Unfortunately for Jared and Lindsay Rowley, fugitive murder suspect Jesse Dimmick ruined their celebration when he broke into their house after crashing a stolen van onto their lawn. Dimmick was fleeing from authorities and held the couple captive as he hid in their home. After the Rowleys fled and police apprehended him, Dimmick filed a lawsuit against his former hostages for $235,000.
Dimmick claims the Rowleys breached a binding, oral contract that stated the couple would hide him from authorities in return for monetary compensation, and blames them for his capture. However, the Rowleys said Dimmick held them at knifepoint and were only able to escape after he fell asleep. Once they did, police entered and accidentally shot Dimmick in the back when a police officer's rifle was discharged.
In his handwritten suit, Dimmick wrote, “As a result of the plaintiffs breech (sic) of contract, I, the defendant suffered a gunshot to my back, which almost killed me. The hospital bills alone are in excess of $160,000, which I have no way to pay.” The Rowleys seek to have the suit dismissed.
Suspicious Citizen
Wilbur Jolly, a 41-year-old man from Buena Vista, Ga., filed a lawsuit seeking $10 million from the federal government, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and former President George W. Bush, claiming he was tracked through “computer chip inhabitation.” In his lawsuit filed last month, Jolly alleges his “ID” was used by the U.S. without his consent in several circumstances, including a credit report that mistakenly showed he was employed by the federal government. Because of this, he says he can't get a job or start a business.
Along with his complaint filed without an attorney, Jolly submitted 14 handwritten motions requesting permission to carry a concealed weapon. However, U.S. Magistrate Stephen Hyles swiftly denied the motions in an eight-page opinion, recommending the complaint be dismissed as frivolous.
Jail Mail
Another dismissed lawsuit involved three Utah jail inmates who claimed Cache County Jail officials violated their constitutional rights by imposing a policy forcing them to correspond via postcards, which the trio said can be read by others. The new policy began in February 2011 and required prisoners to use only postcards, unless they had to send “privileged mail,” such as those between with an attorney or the court. The court tossed their claims after the three were transferred out of Cache County Jail and agreed to dismiss their lawsuit.
15 Seconds of Fame
A New York man claims American Eagle Outfitters and Clear Channel's interactive billboard in Times Square was his idea, according to a story by The New York Post. Jet Thomason filed a lawsuit alleging he came up with the concept in 2003, “before electronic billboards were the thing,” and met with Clear Channel in July 2009 about the “15 Seconds of Fame” billboard, which allows passers-by to see themselves onscreen and post brief messages. He says the companies stole his business plan after he signed a confidentiality agreement, and is seeking $1 million each from American Eagle and Clear Channel.
Avatar Objection
It's not the first “Avatar” lawsuit, and it won't be the last. After James Cameron's epic film became the biggest blockbuster ever, writers continue to claim the story as theirs, with the most recent lawsuit filed by Eric Ryder, a former Lightstorm Entertainment employee.
Ryder says the film is a blatant copy of the idea he presented to Lightstorm in 1999. His work, “K.R.Z. 2068,” was a science fiction story that would be turned into an “environmentally themed 3-D epic about a corporation's colonization and plundering of a distant moon's lush and wondrous setting.”
Ryder also claims his story included “anthropomorphic, organically created beings that populated the moon,” a “corporation spy,” and “self-contained robotic exterior suits which house a single human operator.” Sound familiar? Ryder believes so and alleges “Avatar's” production company implied he would be compensated and credited for the material should it “use or exploit” what Ryder created.
Patent Troll Strikes Again
Yawn. Another day, another patent troll. This time, the achievement goes to Digitude Innovations, an IP licensing company, which sued a whopping eight mobile companies: RIM, LG, Sony, Samsung, Nokia, Motorola, HTC and Amazon.
The lawsuits, filed last week, claim the companies infringed four patents of which Digitude took ownership just last month. The company says it owns more than 550 patents, and announced earlier this year its strategy to monetize patents using an “innovative patent monetization model, where the company will acquire, aggregate, and license key technology areas in a patent consortium through strategic partners.” Innovative indeed.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology
Coinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute readBaker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250