Mothers Against Drunk Driving's message hits home
A few years ago, my husband and I left our convenient life in the city and headed eight miles west, to the suburbs. It was a tough decision.
December 31, 2011 at 07:00 PM
3 minute read
A few years ago, my husband and I left our convenient life in the city and headed eight miles west, to the suburbs. It was a tough decision. We had both spent our entire adult lives within the limits of big cities, and we knew the 'burbs were going to be different. It would be quieter, we would have to mow the lawn and we would be driving more. But we also knew the suburban lifestyle would be more suitable to our future plans.
The first week in our new home, we decided to go out for dinner. We drove to the downtown area and chose a nice little Italian restaurant. There, we had a pre-dinner cocktail and a bottle of wine with dinner. When the meal was over, we walked out of the restaurant, and rather than hailing a cab like we used to, we started heading toward the car. And that's when it hit us: We couldn't drive home. After a brief attempt to “sober up” by drinking Diet Cokes for an hour at a local bar, we accepted our fate and walked. Was it tempting to say, “It's only a mile and a half. We'll make it if we drive.”? Yes, of course. But neither of us wanted to take the risk. Lesson learned.
Versions of this scenario play out over and over every day. Some people choose not to drive when they've had too much to drink, while some risk it and get behind the wheel regardless of how much alcohol they've consumed. It's statistically proven that most of them reach their destinations without causing harm to themselves or others. In fact, an average drunken driver has driven drunk 80 times before his or her first arrest, according to Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD). However, we all know too well the stories of those who aren't so lucky.
I recently sat down with John Ansbach, CLO of MADD, to talk about his work with the organization (see John Ansbach, CLO of Mothers Against Drunk Driving, finds reward in challenging work ). Ansbach is passionate about MADD's mission and the work his legal team does to support it. While many of us were raised to know not to drink and drive, it still happens every day. And for more than 30 years, MADD has worked diligently to get drunken drivers off the streets. So, for my first column of the year, I want to thank MADD and remind all InsideCounsel readers about the dangers of drunken driving. Have a safe and happy 2012.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhite Castle GC Becomes Chain's First President From Outside Family
DLA Piper Adds Former Verizon GC Amid In-House Hiring Spree
Trending Stories
- 1Fenwick and Baker & Hostetler Add DC Partners, as Venable and Brownstein Hire Policy Advisers
- 2H&R Block Accused of Negligence in Data Breach Suit
- 3Apple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology
- 4Following Treasury Hack, Do Federal Cybersecurity Standards Need an Update?
- 5Former Capital One Deputy GC Takes Legal Reins of AIG Spinoff
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250