CH2M HILL lawyer makes a difference
Thanks to Catherine Lang's efforts, a little girl in Colorado is living in a secure environment
February 29, 2012 at 07:00 PM
6 minute read
It's sad, but true: Not all parents' top priority is to keep their children safe. Luckily, some organizations' sole purpose is to help protect kids in danger.
The Rocky Mountain Children's Law Center is one such organization. Since 1981, the Denver-based non-profit has represented abused and neglected kids involved in Colorado Department of Human Services cases. The center's attorneys, clinical consultants and educational advocates work together to minimize unnecessary moves from one home to another, keep siblings together and secure mental health care.
The center also handles crisis calls from community members. In November 2009, a grandmother called the organization. She had been raising three of her grandchildren, including a 6-year-old girl, for more than a year after they were removed from the care of their mother, who had substance-abuse problems. The grandmother recently had started seeking child support from the children's fathers. She was concerned when the young girl's estranged father decided to seek custody of the girl instead.
“This little girl had already been removed from her mom, had been living with her grandma and thriving with her, and now a dad who none of them had ever met was coming forward and saying, 'I don't want to pay child support, I want my kid,'” says Tim Eirich, deputy director at the center.
Just a week prior to the grandmother's call, the center had given a presentation about pro bono opportunities to lawyers at CH2M HILL, a Denver-based international engineering, construction and operations company. Corporate Counsel Catherine Lang had expressed interest in getting involved with the organization, and she agreed to take on the case when the center reached out to her.
“It made complete sense that the grandmother was the solution,” Lang says. “She provided a safe environment; she was parenting the children—they had a family unit already there. To take [the little girl] completely out of that and to put her with her father would have been catastrophic for her from an emotional standpoint.”
Lang, who has a transactional background, says she was grateful to Eirich and others at the center who provided her with resources and guidance. A colleague also mentored Lang.
“It meant a lot to have the personal support from one of the more senior attorneys at CH2M HILL,” Lang says.
Lang worked on the case for about a year, completing filings and meeting with the father's counsel to try to come to a resolution. But the case ended up going to court. Happily, the outcome was good. “I was beyond ecstatic when the grandmother was awarded custody of her granddaughter,” Lang says.
Lang says she looks forward to working with the center again on future cases. “It's a fabulous organization that has a huge impact on children in our state,” she says. “It takes you to a completely different level when [you're helping] children at such a young age dealing with something that's so life-impacting to them. You really get emotionally invested in making sure that the outcome is in their best interest.”
It's sad, but true: Not all parents' top priority is to keep their children safe. Luckily, some organizations' sole purpose is to help protect kids in danger.
The Rocky Mountain Children's Law Center is one such organization. Since 1981, the Denver-based non-profit has represented abused and neglected kids involved in Colorado Department of Human Services cases. The center's attorneys, clinical consultants and educational advocates work together to minimize unnecessary moves from one home to another, keep siblings together and secure mental health care.
The center also handles crisis calls from community members. In November 2009, a grandmother called the organization. She had been raising three of her grandchildren, including a 6-year-old girl, for more than a year after they were removed from the care of their mother, who had substance-abuse problems. The grandmother recently had started seeking child support from the children's fathers. She was concerned when the young girl's estranged father decided to seek custody of the girl instead.
“This little girl had already been removed from her mom, had been living with her grandma and thriving with her, and now a dad who none of them had ever met was coming forward and saying, 'I don't want to pay child support, I want my kid,'” says Tim Eirich, deputy director at the center.
Just a week prior to the grandmother's call, the center had given a presentation about pro bono opportunities to lawyers at
“It made complete sense that the grandmother was the solution,” Lang says. “She provided a safe environment; she was parenting the children—they had a family unit already there. To take [the little girl] completely out of that and to put her with her father would have been catastrophic for her from an emotional standpoint.”
Lang, who has a transactional background, says she was grateful to Eirich and others at the center who provided her with resources and guidance. A colleague also mentored Lang.
“It meant a lot to have the personal support from one of the more senior attorneys at
Lang worked on the case for about a year, completing filings and meeting with the father's counsel to try to come to a resolution. But the case ended up going to court. Happily, the outcome was good. “I was beyond ecstatic when the grandmother was awarded custody of her granddaughter,” Lang says.
Lang says she looks forward to working with the center again on future cases. “It's a fabulous organization that has a huge impact on children in our state,” she says. “It takes you to a completely different level when [you're helping] children at such a young age dealing with something that's so life-impacting to them. You really get emotionally invested in making sure that the outcome is in their best interest.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAdvertising Tech Likely to Draw More Scrutiny in 2025 Over Consumers' Data, Lawyers Say
5 minute read'Be Comfortable Being Uncomfortable': Pearls of Wisdom From 2024 GC Q&As
In-House Moves of the Month: Boeing Loses Another Lawyer, HubSpot Legal Chief Out After 2 Years
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Data Breach Lawsuit Against Byte Federal Among 1,500 Targeting Companies in 2024
- 2Counterfeiters Ride Surge in Tabletop Games’ Popularity, Challenging IP Owners to Keep Up
- 3Health Care Data Breach Class Actions Saw December Surge in NY Courts
- 4Florida Supreme Court Disbars 3, Suspends 11, Reprimands 1 in Final Disciplinary Order of 2024
- 5Chief Justice Roberts Ends Year With Defense Against 'Illegitimate' Attacks on Judiciary
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250