Facts & Figures: 5 sets of newsworthy data
Settlement SlowdownThe number of securities fraud settlements in 2011 dropped to their lowest levels since the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX),…
March 16, 2012 at 06:30 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Settlement Slowdown
The number of securities fraud settlements in 2011 dropped to their lowest levels since the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), according to a new study by Cornerstone Research. But while settlements reached an all-time low, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) was busy filing a historic number of enforcement cases.
65 Securities fraud settlements that won court approval in 2011 (down from 86 in 2010)
$1.36 billion Total payments in those 65 settlements (down from $3.21 billion in 2010)
$19.9 billion Total payouts in 2006, the peak year for such settlements
8.6% Increase in the number of enforcement cases filed by the SEC between 2010 and 2011
$208.5 million Settlement between Washington Mutual and its investors (the largest 2011 deal in the study)
Floundering Firms
The majority of law firm practice groups fall short when it comes to generating business, cross-selling and group planning, according to an Altman Weil Inc. survey of managing partners. The solution? Underperforming firms should devote more time to leadership activities and more thoughtful planning sessions, says Thomas Clay of The American Lawyer. The mostly disheartening statistics are below:
49% Practice groups that are “very good” or “excellent” in overall performance, according to managing partners who were surveyed
63% Firms with a formal practice group planning process
14% Law firms that invested 250 hours or more per year in leadership activities
13% Firms that require mandatory leadership training for practice group leaders (among firms with 500 or more lawyers, the number was closer to one-third)
Stanford Scheme
After three years of investigation, financier R. Allen Stanford was convicted of fraud for his involvement in the biggest Ponzi scheme since the Bernie Madoff scandal. For two decades, Stanford supposedly managed funds for investors from more than 100 countries, when in reality he was using their investments to fund a luxurious lifestyle and a string of failed businesses. Here's a look at the numbers behind Stanford's Ponzi scheme:
$7.1 billion Total amount that Stanford stole from nearly 30,000 investors
$2 billion Stanford's estimated net worth before his arrest
$330 million Total stolen funds that U.S. authorities can seize from Stanford's frozen foreign bank accounts
13 Charges on which jurors convicted Stanford (he was acquitted on one count of wire fraud)
230 Years that Stanford could spend in prison if his sentences run consecutively
Jabbering Jurors
How much damage can you do in 140 characters? If you're a juror, an errant Tweet could lead to a mistrial. To prevent this, many judges are specifically forbidding social media use in their instructions to the jury, according to new survey in the Duke Law & Technology Review. And jurors may be taking these admonitions to heart—many jurors who did not use social media to discuss ongoing cases cited judicial instructions as a deterrent.
50 million Users who log into Twitter daily, according to CEO Dick Costolo
6% Judges responding to the survey who “have not specifically addressed jurors' use of social media”
60% Judges who specifically instructed jurors not to use social media, using the Court Administration and Case Management Committee (CACM) model
92% Percentage of 140 jurors surveyed who said they were not tempted to use social media during trials
Increasing Insurance
It's lonely—and potentially expensive—at the top. Fearing expensive litigation, more and more companies are upping insurance coverage for their executives, according to a 2011 Directors and Officers (D&O) Liability Survey, released by Towers Watson. Key numbers from the survey, which included 401 public, private and non-profit companies, are below:
25% Public companies that increased the limits of their D&O insurance policies in 2011
14% Private and non-profit companies that increased their D&O insurance policies
69% Respondents who received an inquiry about the scope of their D&O insurance (up from 57% in 2010)
81% Respondents who said that regulatory claims are among their top three D&O liability concerns
47% Companies that conducted an independent review of their D&O policies in the past two years
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMeta Workers Aren't of One Mind on Company's Retreat From DEI, Fact-Checking
Private Equity-Backed Medical Imaging Chain Hires CLO, Continuing C-Suite Makeover
White Castle GC Becomes Chain's First President From Outside Family
Trending Stories
- 1Who Are the Judges Assigned to Challenges to Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Order?
- 2Litigators of the Week: A Directed Verdict Win for Cisco in a West Texas Patent Case
- 3Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 4Womble Bond Becomes First Firm in UK to Roll Out AI Tool Firmwide
- 5Will a Market Dominated by Small- to Mid-Cap Deals Give Rise to a Dark Horse US Firm in China?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250