Technology: 4 measures to help protect against network intrusion
In the past 18 months, there has been a steady procession of stories about top U.S. companies that have suffered major network intrusions.
March 23, 2012 at 06:15 AM
7 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
In the past 18 months, there has been a steady procession of stories about top U.S. companies that have suffered major network intrusions. The companies come from a diverse cross-section of the economy, including the technology, telecommunications, finance, retail, energy and health care sectors. Some have entered into multi-million dollar settlements with consumers, some have paid hefty regulatory fines and some are embroiled in costly litigation. And the costs associated with such intrusions continue to rise.
Companies interviewed by the Ponemon Institute for its “2010 Report on the Cost of a Data Breach” reported an average cost of $7.2 million for responding to a breach, up 7 percent from the previous year. The value of proprietary information stolen from U.S. companies' networks over the last year was nearly $500 billion, according to Congressman Mike Rogers, chairman of the House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.
Computer intrusions are so prevalent that every company has reason to be concerned. The tradecraft of the intruders is sophisticated. Many of the companies that come to us for help responding to and remediating network intrusions discover that the intruders have been in their networks undetected for more than a year.
Based on our work with clients, network security vendors, and the law enforcement and national security community, we estimate 30 percent to 40 percent of major U.S. companies are currently unwitting victims of ongoing computer intrusions. An additional 10 percent to 20 percent have detected an intrusion and are assessing their losses, improving their network security practices and struggling to reclaim control of their networks.
What can in-house counsel do to protect against and prepare to respond effectively to a network intrusion? The following “ounce of prevention” measures can help prevent an intrusion, mitigate the damages from an intrusion and save companies expenses associated with response and remediation, litigation, lost revenue and lost business. And when in-house counsel coordinate these measures in order to provide legal advice to a company, the information developed is protected against discovery by the attorney-client privilege.
1. Know your network. The first step in every intrusion response is to map the network. By mapping your network prior to an intrusion you can determine ways to enhance your network's security, ensure compliance with privacy, cybersecurity and data protection regulations and prepare your company to respond quickly and forcefully in the event of a network attack.
What is your network architecture? Is it segmented or flat? Can an intruder who compromises one part of the network easily move to other parts? How are user privileges managed? Are key network activity logs kept and aggregated, particularly for the sensitive parts of your network?
2. Know your data. What types of data does your company maintain? Do you have personal identifying information, health records, confidential data protected by contract or other sensitive types of information? Consider having a privacy review now so you understand what sensitive data you possess, how you are protecting it and the risks and obligations your company may incur if the confidentiality of that data is compromised.
3. Review your network security policies. What are your company's policies regarding network passwords, remote access and removable media? Does your company permit individual users to administer their own computers and download applications and other software? Have you obtained your users' consent to monitor the network in order to detect intrusions?
4. Develop an incident response plan. Do you have a written plan with identified leadership and clearly defined responsibilities? What vendors will you engage for forensic analysis, intrusion response and network remediation? How will your company amass the necessary information technology resources to respond to an intrusion? Are you prepared with a crisis communications strategy that takes into account your employees, investors, customers, government regulators and the public?
Taking these prophylactic steps can prevent, or minimize the damage from, an attack.
In the past 18 months, there has been a steady procession of stories about top U.S. companies that have suffered major network intrusions. The companies come from a diverse cross-section of the economy, including the technology, telecommunications, finance, retail, energy and health care sectors. Some have entered into multi-million dollar settlements with consumers, some have paid hefty regulatory fines and some are embroiled in costly litigation. And the costs associated with such intrusions continue to rise.
Companies interviewed by the Ponemon Institute for its “2010 Report on the Cost of a Data Breach” reported an average cost of $7.2 million for responding to a breach, up 7 percent from the previous year. The value of proprietary information stolen from U.S. companies' networks over the last year was nearly $500 billion, according to Congressman Mike Rogers, chairman of the House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.
Computer intrusions are so prevalent that every company has reason to be concerned. The tradecraft of the intruders is sophisticated. Many of the companies that come to us for help responding to and remediating network intrusions discover that the intruders have been in their networks undetected for more than a year.
Based on our work with clients, network security vendors, and the law enforcement and national security community, we estimate 30 percent to 40 percent of major U.S. companies are currently unwitting victims of ongoing computer intrusions. An additional 10 percent to 20 percent have detected an intrusion and are assessing their losses, improving their network security practices and struggling to reclaim control of their networks.
What can in-house counsel do to protect against and prepare to respond effectively to a network intrusion? The following “ounce of prevention” measures can help prevent an intrusion, mitigate the damages from an intrusion and save companies expenses associated with response and remediation, litigation, lost revenue and lost business. And when in-house counsel coordinate these measures in order to provide legal advice to a company, the information developed is protected against discovery by the attorney-client privilege.
1. Know your network. The first step in every intrusion response is to map the network. By mapping your network prior to an intrusion you can determine ways to enhance your network's security, ensure compliance with privacy, cybersecurity and data protection regulations and prepare your company to respond quickly and forcefully in the event of a network attack.
What is your network architecture? Is it segmented or flat? Can an intruder who compromises one part of the network easily move to other parts? How are user privileges managed? Are key network activity logs kept and aggregated, particularly for the sensitive parts of your network?
2. Know your data. What types of data does your company maintain? Do you have personal identifying information, health records, confidential data protected by contract or other sensitive types of information? Consider having a privacy review now so you understand what sensitive data you possess, how you are protecting it and the risks and obligations your company may incur if the confidentiality of that data is compromised.
3. Review your network security policies. What are your company's policies regarding network passwords, remote access and removable media? Does your company permit individual users to administer their own computers and download applications and other software? Have you obtained your users' consent to monitor the network in order to detect intrusions?
4. Develop an incident response plan. Do you have a written plan with identified leadership and clearly defined responsibilities? What vendors will you engage for forensic analysis, intrusion response and network remediation? How will your company amass the necessary information technology resources to respond to an intrusion? Are you prepared with a crisis communications strategy that takes into account your employees, investors, customers, government regulators and the public?
Taking these prophylactic steps can prevent, or minimize the damage from, an attack.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllExits Leave American Airlines, SiriusXM, Spotify Searching for New Legal Chiefs
2 minute read'A Warning Shot to Board Rooms': DOJ Decision to Fight $14B Tech Merger May Be Bad Omen for Industry
'Incredibly Complicated'? Antitrust Litigators Identify Pros and Cons of Proposed One Agency Act
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250