Egan Exception
The Dodd-Frank Act protects any employee whistleblower—as long as he reports directly to the SEC. But a district court’s recent decision in…
March 26, 2012 at 11:02 AM
3 minute read
The Dodd-Frank Act protects any employee whistleblower—as long as he reports directly to the SEC. But a district court's recent decision in Egan v. TradingScreen Inc. may have created a loophole for internal reporting at a private company.
The plaintiff in this case, Patrick Egan, reported internally that he suspected the CEO was diverting company assets. The company hired outside lawyers to launch an internal investigation, and they released a report confirming Egan's allegations. But the CEO regained control of the board and fired Egan. Egan claimed that he qualified for Dodd-Frank protection because he and the lawyers were working jointly as whistleblowers. The court wrote that if Egan could prove the knowledge from the investigation was sent to the SEC, he might qualify for Dodd- Frank protection. The court granted Egan leave to amend his causes of action.
“This decision expands the reporting,” says Tammy Marzigliano, a partner at Outten & Golden. “The whole point of the Dodd-Frank Act is to capture corporate fraud, so the intent behind it is they want to be able to have these laws give protection, not close the door for people.”
The Dodd-Frank Act protects any employee whistleblower—as long as he reports directly to the SEC. But a district court's recent decision in Egan v. TradingScreen Inc. may have created a loophole for internal reporting at a private company.
The plaintiff in this case, Patrick Egan, reported internally that he suspected the CEO was diverting company assets. The company hired outside lawyers to launch an internal investigation, and they released a report confirming Egan's allegations. But the CEO regained control of the board and fired Egan. Egan claimed that he qualified for Dodd-Frank protection because he and the lawyers were working jointly as whistleblowers. The court wrote that if Egan could prove the knowledge from the investigation was sent to the SEC, he might qualify for Dodd- Frank protection. The court granted Egan leave to amend his causes of action.
“This decision expands the reporting,” says Tammy Marzigliano, a partner at
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCrypto Industry Eyes Legislation to Clarify Regulatory Framework
SEC Official Hints at More Restraint With Industry Bars, Less With Wells Meetings
4 minute readTrump Fires EEOC Commissioners, Kneecapping Democrat-Controlled Civil Rights Agency
Trending Stories
- 1AIAs: A Look At the Future of AI-Related Contracts
- 2Litigators of the Week: A $630M Antitrust Settlement for Automotive Software Vendors—$140M More Than Alleged Overcharges
- 3Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 4Linklaters Hires Four Partners From Patterson Belknap
- 5Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise, Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250