14 U.S. law firms merge in Q1 2012
Its steady as she goes for law firms so far this year when it comes to mergers and acquisitions. A survey released yesterday by legal consultancy Altman Weil Inc. says that 2012s M&A activity continues the rebound of law firm combinations that began in Q3 2010 and held firm through...
April 03, 2012 at 07:42 AM
34 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
It's steady as she goes for law firms so far this year when it comes to mergers and acquisitions. A survey released yesterday by legal consultancy Altman Weil Inc. says that 2012's M&A activity continues the rebound of law firm combinations that began in Q3 2010 and held firm through all of 2011.
In Q1 2012, there have been 14 mergers and acquisitions announced in the U.S., which is on pace compared to 16 in Q1 2011 and about 15 over the past six quarters. This is in line with pre-recession levels, Altman Weil says.
According to the study, there typically are one or two major law firm mergers announced in Q1 each year, as well as a number of smaller ones, and this year is no exception. In mid-January, Washington, D.C.-based McKenna Long & Aldridge and San Diego-based Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps announced that they would tie the knot on March 1. The combined firm retained the McKenna Long & Aldridge moniker, and employs more than 600 attorneys and public policy advisors in 15 offices across the U.S. and abroad.
Altman Weil noted that five large law firms made geographic moves with small, strategic acquisitions in the first quarter: K&L Gates acquired Marini Salsi Picciau in Milan—the firm's first Italian office. Littler Mendelson acquired Memphis, Tenn.-based labor and employment firm Kiesewetter Wise Kaplan Prather. Jackson Lewis combined with Milwaukee firm Simandl & Prentice. Baker Donelson acquired Houston-based Drucker Rutledge & Smith. Womble Carlyle acquired Hall & Bowers in Columbia, S.C. And Carroll, Burdick & McDonough, a 72-lawyer, San Francisco-based firm, combined with Schweiger & Partners, a five-lawyer, intellectual property boutique with offices in Germany and Singapore.
“In this type of combination, the larger firm is able to acquire new client relationships in new markets and the smaller firm is able to execute a transition that works for the partners and their clients,” Altman Weil Principal Eric Seeger said in the study.
In addition to these moves, there were 11 deals announced in Q4 2011 that were finalized in Q1 2012, which also is congruent with normal merger patterns. Of these 11 pacts, some of the most notable are Bryan Cave's acquisition of Holme Roberts & Owen, and the merger between Faegre & Benson and Baker & Daniels.
It's steady as she goes for law firms so far this year when it comes to mergers and acquisitions. A survey released yesterday by legal consultancy Altman Weil Inc. says that 2012's M&A activity continues the rebound of law firm combinations that began in Q3 2010 and held firm through all of 2011.
In Q1 2012, there have been 14 mergers and acquisitions announced in the U.S., which is on pace compared to 16 in Q1 2011 and about 15 over the past six quarters. This is in line with pre-recession levels, Altman Weil says.
According to the study, there typically are one or two major law firm mergers announced in Q1 each year, as well as a number of smaller ones, and this year is no exception. In mid-January, Washington, D.C.-based
Altman Weil noted that five large law firms made geographic moves with small, strategic acquisitions in the first quarter:
“In this type of combination, the larger firm is able to acquire new client relationships in new markets and the smaller firm is able to execute a transition that works for the partners and their clients,” Altman Weil Principal Eric Seeger said in the study.
In addition to these moves, there were 11 deals announced in Q4 2011 that were finalized in Q1 2012, which also is congruent with normal merger patterns. Of these 11 pacts, some of the most notable are
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
8 minute readWhy ACLU's New Legal Director Says It's a 'Good Time to Take the Reins'
'Utterly Bewildering': GCs Struggle to Grasp Scattershot Nature of Law Firm Rate Hikes
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250