BofA's CEO must submit to deposition
Its a general counsels worst nightmare come true. On Wednesday, New York Supreme Court Justice Eileen Bransten shot down Bank of Americas request to exclude its CEO Brian Moynihan from testifying in a lawsuit brought by bond insurer MBIA Inc.
April 13, 2012 at 07:12 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
It's a general counsel's worst nightmare come true. On Wednesday, New York Supreme Court Justice Eileen Bransten shot down Bank of America's (BofA) request to exclude its CEO Brian Moynihan from testifying in a lawsuit brought by bond insurer MBIA Inc.
MBIA accused Countrywide Financial Corp., which BofA acquired in July 2008, of fraudulently inducing it to insure unsafe mortgage-backed securities. The next year, MBIA claimed BofA was liable for the mortgage lender's conduct.
Justice Bransten decided that Moynihan could provide relevant testimony in the case given his lofty position, his previous role as president of investment banking and because he oversaw the acquisition and integration of Countrywide during that time.
“The knowledge Moynihan gained as part of the (Countrywide) Steering Committee is unique, and it is material and necessary to MBIA's successor liability claim,” Bransten said, adding that Moynihan's involvement in high-level decisions regarding the acquisition won't duplicate that of any of the lower-level employees slated to testify.
BofA had argued that MBIA wanted his deposition only to harass the nation's second-largest bank, and that its CEO had no special knowledge of the case.
This case against BofA and Countrywide is just one of many related to Countrywide and the sale of mortgage-backed securities.
In December 2011, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that it reached a settlement with BofA over charges that Countrywide discriminated against certain borrowers during the housing boom. The $335 million agreement marked the largest fair-lending settlement in the country's history, the DOJ said at the time.
Earlier in December, BofA also agreed to a $315 million settlement with investors who claimed they were bilked over mortgage-backed securities offered by its Merrill Lynch unit. The deal was hailed as one of the largest-ever settlements of investor claims against banks related to toxic mortgage-backed securities.
Prior to this, in September 2011, BofA was reportedly considering having the Countrywide business unit file for bankruptcy if litigation losses threaten to topple the parent company. If BofA did so, the bank could use the threat as leverage against plaintiffs seeking refunds on bad mortgages. A Countrywide bankruptcy could halt legal proceedings and consolidate litigation into one court that would divide Countrywide's remaining assets for creditors.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Lawsuit Against Amazon Could Reshape E-Commerce Landscape
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250