Dewey’s potential merger with SNR Denton falls apart
Following Mondays revelation that failing New York law firm Dewey & LeBoeufs management team sent a memo to all of its partners suggesting they seek other employment, things have continued to head south.
May 03, 2012 at 07:07 AM
23 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Following Monday's revelation that failing New York law firm Dewey & LeBoeuf's management team sent a memo to all of its partners suggesting they seek other employment, things have continued to head south.
The Wall Street Journal reported yesterday that merger talks between Dewey and law firm SNR Denton collapsed after nine days of intensive negotiation. The discussions deteriorated after news broke last weekend that former firm chairman Steven Davis was relieved of his duties amid questions surrounding his conduct and a Manhattan district attorney's office probe.
SNR Denton reportedly had suggested a full merger in which it would have assumed the more than 1,000 remaining Dewey attorneys. However, the deal was dependent upon the merged firm's ability to secure hundreds of millions of dollars in financing, which the new entity would have repaid over a period of five years.
A few days earlier, Dewey severed merger discussions with law firm Greenberg Traurig. According to an internal memo, Dewey's executive committee team said its decision to oust Davis was neither related to the cessation of talks with Greenberg Traurig nor the prosecutors' investigation.
The Journal reported that after this latest setback, Dewey is continuing to negotiate with SNR Denton and other firms. Additionally, SNR Denton is continuing talks with some of Dewey's lawyers and practice groups in an effort to lure them to greener pastures.
As for next steps, Dewey is reportedly considering filing for bankruptcy as a means to merge with or be acquired by another law firm, although Martin Bienenstock, head of the firm's restructuring practice and a member of the its four-person office of the chairman, said that bankruptcy is a last resort and not currently planned.
“We are in discussions with other firms about a possible transaction and will consider those and other options for the firm moving forward,” Dewey's management team wrote in a memo last weekend.
The Journal also reported that Dewey had talks with Washington, D.C.-based Patton Boggs about a potential merger.
For more on the failed SNR Denton merger, read the Journal.
And for more on Dewey's downfall, read:
Following Monday's revelation that failing
The Wall Street Journal reported yesterday that merger talks between Dewey and law firm
A few days earlier, Dewey severed merger discussions with law firm
The Journal reported that after this latest setback, Dewey is continuing to negotiate with
As for next steps, Dewey is reportedly considering filing for bankruptcy as a means to merge with or be acquired by another law firm, although Martin Bienenstock, head of the firm's restructuring practice and a member of the its four-person office of the chairman, said that bankruptcy is a last resort and not currently planned.
“We are in discussions with other firms about a possible transaction and will consider those and other options for the firm moving forward,” Dewey's management team wrote in a memo last weekend.
The Journal also reported that Dewey had talks with Washington, D.C.-based
For more on the failed
And for more on Dewey's downfall, read:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
8 minute readWhy ACLU's New Legal Director Says It's a 'Good Time to Take the Reins'
'Utterly Bewildering': GCs Struggle to Grasp Scattershot Nature of Law Firm Rate Hikes
GCs Jettisoning Zero-Based Budgeting in Quest to Be Nimble, More Efficient
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Bar Report — Nov. 25, 2024
- 2People in the News—Nov. 25, 2024—Eckert Seamans, Klehr Harrison
- 3How We Made Practice Group Chair: 'One of the Most Important Skills Is Being a Good Listener,' Say Timothy Kincaid and Brad Vaiana of Winston & Strawn
- 4Avoiding Inadvertent Conflict Issues With Constituents When Representing Organizational Clients
- 5Debtor-Owner Allowed to Modify Mortgage in Bankruptcy Even if Debtor Is Not Obligor Under the Mortgage Loan
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250