Litigation: The accidental lobbyist
Your company wants to challenge a regulation or a federal agencys interpretation of a statute. But maybe you can resolve the matter without litigation, so you call someone you know in the federal agency to set up a meeting. That meeting may lead to another meeting. And therein lies the...
May 03, 2012 at 06:07 AM
7 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Your company wants to challenge a regulation or a federal agency's interpretation of a statute. But maybe you can resolve the matter without litigation, so you call someone you know in the federal agency to set up a meeting. That meeting may lead to another meeting. And therein lies the potential problem.
Although citizens and foreign nationals are free to petition the U.S. government to advocate for their positions on regulations or policy, those planning on making such calls must beware. A call and a meeting—or even two telephone calls—might make you a lobbyist, thereby subjecting you to registration and reporting requirements under the federal Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA). And if your company or client is a foreign national, particularly if you represent a part of a foreign government, you may have entered the realm of the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), which imposes a separate set of registration and reporting requirements. Penalties for noncompliance can be severe, and defending an action or responding to an investigation can be expensive and time-consuming.
The LDA defines a lobbyist as someone who makes more than one lobbying contact and who spends 20 percent or more of his time on behalf of an employer or a client engaged in lobbying activities in any three-month period. If the prior two requirements are satisfied, lobbying registration is required if a lobbying firm's compensation in any three month period exceeds or is expected to exceed $3,000, or if an entity employing lobbyists expends or is expected to expend $11,500 on lobbying activities in any three-month period. Although requests for meetings, information and written communications on the record generally do not constitute lobbying contacts, off-the-record communications—both written and oral—might constitute such contacts.
Once registered, lobbying firms and organizations employing lobbyists become subject to the LDA's reporting requirements, which consist of quarterly reports of lobbying activities, and semiannual reports of political contributions by the organization and by each lobbyist. Registrants must comply with these reporting requirements until formally “terminated” as lobbyists, regardless of whether the organization or individual lobbyists engaged in any lobbying activity during the reporting period, or, if so, whether the amounts or percentages of time devoted to this activity met or exceeded any or all of the registration thresholds in the period covered by the report. The maximum civil penalty for knowing failure to comply with the LDA's provisions is $200,000, and the act imposes criminal penalties of up to five years imprisonment, fines under the U.S. Criminal Code, or both.
In addition to the LDA implications, employees or representatives of foreign principals who make contacts with U.S. government officials must consider whether such contacts would trigger registration under FARA. Agents of foreign principals, including employees, must register under FARA when they engage in political activities or act as public relations counsel for that foreign principal. “Political activities” are defined as any activity intending or attempting to influence official action by a federal government employee or official or any section of the public within the U.S. with reference to formulating, adopting, or changing the domestic or foreign policies of the U.S. or with reference to the political or public interests, policies or relations of a government of a foreign country or a foreign political party.
FARA contains an exemption from registration under its provisions for agents of foreign commercial entities (as opposed to foreign governments or foreign political parties) that elect to register under the LDA. And, though FARA contains an exemption from registration for persons engaged in legal representation, that exemption generally applies only to contacts made on the record. Thus, an off-the-record contact with a U.S. government official on behalf of a foreign principal attempting to resolve a litigation matter or other dispute could subject to the person making the contact to FARA registration and reporting.
Registrants must file an initial registration statement and then supplemental registration statements twice yearly to report on activities performed for the foreign principal. FARA provides criminal penalties for noncompliance, which can include a fine of up to $10,000 or imprisonment for up to five years, or both, for each violation.
Your company wants to challenge a regulation or a federal agency's interpretation of a statute. But maybe you can resolve the matter without litigation, so you call someone you know in the federal agency to set up a meeting. That meeting may lead to another meeting. And therein lies the potential problem.
Although citizens and foreign nationals are free to petition the U.S. government to advocate for their positions on regulations or policy, those planning on making such calls must beware. A call and a meeting—or even two telephone calls—might make you a lobbyist, thereby subjecting you to registration and reporting requirements under the federal Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA). And if your company or client is a foreign national, particularly if you represent a part of a foreign government, you may have entered the realm of the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), which imposes a separate set of registration and reporting requirements. Penalties for noncompliance can be severe, and defending an action or responding to an investigation can be expensive and time-consuming.
The LDA defines a lobbyist as someone who makes more than one lobbying contact and who spends 20 percent or more of his time on behalf of an employer or a client engaged in lobbying activities in any three-month period. If the prior two requirements are satisfied, lobbying registration is required if a lobbying firm's compensation in any three month period exceeds or is expected to exceed $3,000, or if an entity employing lobbyists expends or is expected to expend $11,500 on lobbying activities in any three-month period. Although requests for meetings, information and written communications on the record generally do not constitute lobbying contacts, off-the-record communications—both written and oral—might constitute such contacts.
Once registered, lobbying firms and organizations employing lobbyists become subject to the LDA's reporting requirements, which consist of quarterly reports of lobbying activities, and semiannual reports of political contributions by the organization and by each lobbyist. Registrants must comply with these reporting requirements until formally “terminated” as lobbyists, regardless of whether the organization or individual lobbyists engaged in any lobbying activity during the reporting period, or, if so, whether the amounts or percentages of time devoted to this activity met or exceeded any or all of the registration thresholds in the period covered by the report. The maximum civil penalty for knowing failure to comply with the LDA's provisions is $200,000, and the act imposes criminal penalties of up to five years imprisonment, fines under the U.S. Criminal Code, or both.
In addition to the LDA implications, employees or representatives of foreign principals who make contacts with U.S. government officials must consider whether such contacts would trigger registration under FARA. Agents of foreign principals, including employees, must register under FARA when they engage in political activities or act as public relations counsel for that foreign principal. “Political activities” are defined as any activity intending or attempting to influence official action by a federal government employee or official or any section of the public within the U.S. with reference to formulating, adopting, or changing the domestic or foreign policies of the U.S. or with reference to the political or public interests, policies or relations of a government of a foreign country or a foreign political party.
FARA contains an exemption from registration under its provisions for agents of foreign commercial entities (as opposed to foreign governments or foreign political parties) that elect to register under the LDA. And, though FARA contains an exemption from registration for persons engaged in legal representation, that exemption generally applies only to contacts made on the record. Thus, an off-the-record contact with a U.S. government official on behalf of a foreign principal attempting to resolve a litigation matter or other dispute could subject to the person making the contact to FARA registration and reporting.
Registrants must file an initial registration statement and then supplemental registration statements twice yearly to report on activities performed for the foreign principal. FARA provides criminal penalties for noncompliance, which can include a fine of up to $10,000 or imprisonment for up to five years, or both, for each violation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250