Executives expect increase in mergers, strategic alliances in 2012
Law firms have seen an uptick in M&A activity this year, but the corporate world is increasingly turning to smaller deals and strategic alliances to grow their companies, according to a new survey from professional services firm Deloitte.
May 23, 2012 at 08:25 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Law firms have seen an uptick in M&A activity this year, but the corporate world is increasingly turning to smaller deals and strategic alliances to grow their companies, according to a new survey from professional services firm Deloitte.
Of the 309 executives responding to the survey, 46 percent expect an increase in M&A activity. But an even greater number—54 percent—predict an increase in strategic alliance transactions over the next two years. The most-cited reason for this increase was investment in countries where strategic alliances are required or preferred (35 percent).
“The perception of strategic alliances is changing from a last resort to a preferred investment strategy, especially in emerging markets,” said Chris Ruggeri, who leads Deloitte's M&A services, “and companies are learning from industries like technology and life sciences that use strategic alliances very effectively to manage risk and capital.”
Corporate boards also are showing a growing interest in mergers. Forty-one percent of respondents said that boards have increased their involvement in M&A activity in the past two years, mostly by requiring more frequent board updates during deals.
Companies are less proactive when it comes to divestitures, though, with 37 percent of those surveyed saying their companies “rarely” or “never” review their portfolios for divestiture opportunities. The study acknowledges that companies generally focus on “growth-oriented, positive activities” rather than shedding assets, but notes that companies who underestimate the level of work required in separations often lose much of a deal's potential value.
More key findings from the survey are below:
20% of companies are actively pursuing major transactions, according to CFOs
51% of respondents said that strategic alignment of partners is the most important factor in alliances
35% of respondents cited differences of opinion in how to value contributions to the alliance as the factor that most often delays strategic partnerships
40% of companies routinely review their portfolios for potential divestitures
To read more survey results, visit Deloitte's website.
Law firms have seen an uptick in M&A activity this year, but the corporate world is increasingly turning to smaller deals and strategic alliances to grow their companies, according to a new survey from professional services firm
Of the 309 executives responding to the survey, 46 percent expect an increase in M&A activity. But an even greater number—54 percent—predict an increase in strategic alliance transactions over the next two years. The most-cited reason for this increase was investment in countries where strategic alliances are required or preferred (35 percent).
“The perception of strategic alliances is changing from a last resort to a preferred investment strategy, especially in emerging markets,” said Chris Ruggeri, who leads
Corporate boards also are showing a growing interest in mergers. Forty-one percent of respondents said that boards have increased their involvement in M&A activity in the past two years, mostly by requiring more frequent board updates during deals.
Companies are less proactive when it comes to divestitures, though, with 37 percent of those surveyed saying their companies “rarely” or “never” review their portfolios for divestiture opportunities. The study acknowledges that companies generally focus on “growth-oriented, positive activities” rather than shedding assets, but notes that companies who underestimate the level of work required in separations often lose much of a deal's potential value.
More key findings from the survey are below:
20% of companies are actively pursuing major transactions, according to CFOs
51% of respondents said that strategic alignment of partners is the most important factor in alliances
35% of respondents cited differences of opinion in how to value contributions to the alliance as the factor that most often delays strategic partnerships
40% of companies routinely review their portfolios for potential divestitures
To read more survey results, visit
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
8 minute readWhy ACLU's New Legal Director Says It's a 'Good Time to Take the Reins'
'Utterly Bewildering': GCs Struggle to Grasp Scattershot Nature of Law Firm Rate Hikes
Trending Stories
- 1'That Decision was Wrong:' Federal Judge Rethinks Consumer Protection Class Certification
- 2Bar Report — Dec. 2, 2024
- 3The Impact of Erlinger on Predicate Felony Sentencing Statutes
- 4To Ease Partner Pay Tensions, Some Law Firms Are Seeking 'Middle Ground' in Transparency
- 5How Legal Aid and Tech Collaboration Can Bridge the Justice Gap
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250