Regulatory: Developing a political compliance plan
Compliance is an essential component to any political activity. The risks of noncompliance involve not only civil and criminal sanctions, but also reputational harm and bad publicity.
May 23, 2012 at 05:00 AM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
It should be apparent from our series on political activities (participating in politics, super PACs, pay-to-play, corporate law restrictions, lobbying disclosure) that compliance is an essential component to any political activity. The risks of noncompliance involve not only civil and criminal sanctions, but also reputational harm and bad publicity. Loss of reputation may hinder or even reverse successes in the legislative and political sphere.
The compliance plan
A good compliance plan will be comprehensive, easy to follow and easy to monitor. No one model is perfect for every company or organization, but the following are key components to a successful plan.
1. Draft and disseminate simple and clear policies on political activities that:
|- Explain the company's policy on political contributions and other political activity
- Prohibit the use of corporate facilities and staff in connection with personal volunteer political activity, unless authorized and permitted by law
- Restrict employees from lobbying unless specifically authorized to do so
- Prohibit giving impermissible gifts
- Require political contributions to be pre-cleared if the company is subject to pay-to-play rules
- Prohibit coercion of political contributions
2. Provide regular training and updates to officers and employees involved in government affairs, compliance and others who may interact from time to time with government officials.
3. Develop a central calendar of all report due dates for lobbying and political giving. Include not only the dates the reports are due, but also dates on which drafts are to be prepared and all of the steps for sign-off on the reports. This will leave plenty of time for accurate and timely reports.
4. Develop a central file for all lobbying contracts, and be certain they have obligations for the lobbyist to file all reports, share all reports with the company before they are filed, and comply with all applicable gift and ethics rules (note: many states prohibit contingency fee contracts for legislative services).
5. Determine who will be responsible for signing off on and answering questions about decisions to:
|- Hire outside lobbyists
- Authorize internal employees to lobby
- Disburse corporate funds for political contributions
- Disburse corporate funds for trade associations, social welfare organizations and charities
- Donate to independent expenditure committees such as super PACs
- Make statements about legislation that will impact the company
- Engage in grassroots advocacy with customers, employees or the public
6. Determine who will be responsible for filing lobbying reports and implement appropriate tracking mechanisms to compile the relevant data.
7. Ensure that the tax department is aware of all legislative and political activities so that those costs are treated as nondeductible.
8. Clearly delineate the restricted class of individuals eligible for PAC membership or to participate in other political activities.
9. Track lobbying and political costs accurately and simply (this includes association memberships, travel to Washington, D.C., for legislative visits, outside lobbyist fees and other similar expenses).
10. Track employee time for those employees engaged in lobbying activities.
11. Don't forget your outside consultants. As your agents, it is important that they understand the company's rules regarding political activity and gifts.
12. Instill a culture of asking first. For example, for site visits or invitations to receptions or charitable fundraising events, there is often a right way to accomplish your goals. But because gift rules can be very technical and specific, it is important to review planned activity even before extending an invitation.
Other considerations in a plan
PAC:If the organization has a political action committee, it should develop bylaws that provide a structure of governance for the PAC. Some PACs allow a single individual or small group to decide how the PAC will distribute its funds, and others have a more robust governing committee to make those decisions. Regardless of the model, it should work with the company's government affairs team to support those efforts and not run counter to them. Even if the company is not planning to make many contributions, creating a PAC can give the company flexibility to pay for fundraising events.
If the PAC is active at the state level, then, depending on the state, it likely will have to register and report in that state (or at the very least, file its Federal Election Committee reports with the state).
Contributions:If the organization makes direct corporate contributions in state elections, then it must determine who gets to decide to whom to contribute. This could involve the PAC committee or other senior management. The company should have appropriate controls in place to make certain that an employee will not authorize a contribution that might embarrass the company. Also, remember to monitor in-kind contributions, such as catering for fundraising events and use of corporate offices for political activity.
Interactions with officials:Companies that interact with consumers may find themselves interacting with candidates and political officials outside of the lobbying or political sphere. They must be careful to avoid giving inadvertent gifts to officials subject to gift limitations. For example, hotels cannot simply comp rooms for elected officials, wireless phone companies cannot give phones to campaigns and so forth.
Senior management: Interacting with the government may involve senior management in two different ways.
- They may be called upon to meet with elected officials and to help lobbying for a company's positions. This is permissible, but those individuals need to understand the rules, and they will likely have to track their time and expenses for lobbying purposes. Beware that some states now regulate “goodwill lobbying,” which applies to efforts to cultivate relationships with officials regardless of whether specific legislation or other matters are even discussed.
- Contributions to candidates or third-party groups may raise the company's profile, and senior management should be kept briefed on those expenditures and contributions.
Although there has been criticism of corporate legislative and political activities recently, it is simply a fact of life that many organizations will have to be engaged with the government and politicians. Doing so requires careful planning and compliance to avoid running afoul of the many restrictions and disclosure obligations imposed by state and federal campaign finance, lobbying disclosure and gift and ethics rules.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFatal Shooting of CEO Sets Off Scramble to Reassess Executive Security
5 minute readBen & Jerry’s Accuses Corporate Parent of ‘Silencing’ Support for Palestinian Rights
3 minute readShareholder Activists Poised to Pounce in 2025. Is Your Board Ready?
Regulatory Upheaval Is Coming. How Businesses Prepare and Respond Will Separate Winners and Losers
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250