Leukemia & Lymphona Society: A model non-profit
Organization's research funding saved Bruce Collins' life
May 29, 2012 at 08:00 PM
4 minute read
I've never written about the most important non-profit organization in my life—until now. Indeed, if it were not for the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society (LLS) I would not have a life at all. That is not an exaggeration.
I mention LLS now because this is the 10th anniversary of my leukemia diagnosis. On my birthday in 2002, I found out I had a rare and incurable blood cancer called chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). The treatment options at the time were not good, and I was likely to live, at most, only another eight years. However, just a few months before I got the bad news, the Food & Drug Administration had approved a new drug called Gleevec, the first of the so-called molecularly targeted therapies. That means the drug kills only the cancer cells without harming healthy cells. I started taking Gleevec and was almost back to normal within weeks. I still take that big orange pill every day. The result? My oncologist says I'm more likely to die with CML than of it.
I quickly learned that the research leading to this lifesaving miracle drug was funded by LLS, a charity created in 1949 whose stated mission is to cure blood cancers and improve the quality of life of patients and their families. As a CML patient, the more I learned about LLS and its help to people like me, the more I wanted to get involved. As a lawyer who practices in the non-profit sector, I was impressed with its mission, its successes, its programs, its staff and its integrity. For one thing, in all the time I've been paying attention to charities, LLS has never been in the headlines for any of the offenses we've seen elsewhere, such as outrageous salaries, huge fundraising costs or misspent funds.
As a board member of the National Capital Area Chapter, I have a decided bias toward LLS, but I have that bias for good reasons. For example, according to the latest reports, LLS spends 78.1 percent of its revenue on programs such as drug research and direct aid to patients like me. It is complying with its formal corporate policy not to let overhead costs exceed 25 percent—a policy many charities would do well to emulate.
And the society's research funding is making a real difference. In the 1950s, childhood leukemia, the most common, was 100 percent fatal! By the 1960s the 10-year survival rate was slightly better at less than 10 percent. Today, a child diagnosed with leukemia has better than a 90 percent chance to live a natural lifespan. The difference can be attributed directly to the LLS-funded research into new drugs and treatments. I'm living proof of that. Before Gleevec, the CML survival rate was also less than 10 percent. Now, with Gleevec and the newer and better drugs called “super-Gleevecs” that followed, the survival rate is better than 90 percent. I would be foolish and ungrateful not to be a booster of this particular charity. So I am.
My involvement with LLS has deepened my appreciation for non-profit law and many of its facets. If you sit on a charity board, you analyze issues from a different and more informed perspective. If you raise money from your friends and colleagues for a charity, as I do, you are much more attentive to where the money goes. If you work with the staff and join in with the volunteers, you think more deeply about risks to them. If you have benefited from the charity's mission, as I have, your motivation becomes more than legal, analytical or policy-driven. It becomes personal. And so it has with me.
I've given my time and effort to raise funds to support more research to develop treatments like Gleevec. My current campaign is viewable at nca.lls.llsevent.org/BruceCollins. My goal is to find cures by funding research. And, to be able to stop taking that big orange pill every day.
Bruce D. Collins is corporate vice president and general counsel of C-SPAN, based in Washington, D.C. Email him at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGC With Deep GM Experience Takes Legal Reins of Power Management Giant
2 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute read'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readUS Reviewer of Foreign Transactions Sees More Political, Policy Influence, Say Observers
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250