Major TV broadcasters sue Dish Network over ad-skipping technology
In bad news for TV junkies, three television networks are suing Dish Network over its new Hopper digital video recorder (DVR).
May 29, 2012 at 08:17 AM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
In bad news for TV junkies, three television networks are suing Dish Network over its new Hopper digital video recorder (DVR), which allows customers to automatically skip television commercials. It looks like viewers may have to suffer through endless ads…or just change the channel during commercial breaks like always.
The Hopper—introduced on May 10—allows viewers to automatically record the primetime lineups of ABC, CBS, Fox and NBC, and then watch those programs without commercials using Dish's “Auto Hop” technology. The major broadcast networks quickly filed separate suits against Dish on charges including copyright infringement and breach of contract.
Fox's complaint argues that the Hopper will “under[mine] legitimate consumer choice by undercutting authorized on-demand services,” and that it “will ultimately destroy the advertising-supported ecosystem.”
In its own suit seeking declaratory relief, Dish says that the Hopper “is simply making it easier for viewers to refuse to be a captive audience and to exercise the well-accepted choice to skip a commercial.”
In 1984, the Supreme Court ruled that using Sony Corp.'s Betamax videotape to record TV shows did not constitute copyright infringement, saying that “even the unauthorized home time-shifting of respondents' programs is legitimate fair use.”
But in their current suits, the broadcast networks attempt to differentiate between the Betamax case and the Hopper DVR, stating that Dish encourages TV viewers to infringe by skipping commercials and by storing TV shows for extended periods of time. They also claim that Dish is violating its contracts by allowing customers to watch TV programs on-demand and stream shows to computers.
Read more from The Hollywood Reporter.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
5 minute readIn-House Lawyers Are Focused on Employment and Cybersecurity Disputes, But Looking Out for Conflict Over AI
Trending Stories
- 1Kirkland Is Entering a New Market. Will Its Rates Get a Warm Welcome?
- 2African Law Firm Investigated Over ‘AI-Generated’ Case References
- 3Gen AI and Associate Legal Writing: Davis Wright Tremaine's New Training Model
- 4Departing Attorneys Sue Their Former Law Firm
- 5Pa. High Court: Concrete Proof Not Needed to Weigh Grounds for Preliminary Injunction Order
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250