Regulatory: Take me out to the ball game? Think twice
Companies looking to give gifts to politicians or government employees face stiff restrictions
May 30, 2012 at 11:45 PM
10 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Every business—large and small—knows the value of maintaining good relations with the members of Congress who represent its state and legislative district and those who serve on committees with jurisdiction over its industry. Similarly, businesses seek to maintain cordial relations with those in the executive branch of the federal government charged with regulating their industries. How better to enhance these relationships than with tickets to the big game or a sold-out concert?
Those contemplating extending such invitations, however, need to beware of gift rules and restrictions applicable to members of Congress or to their staffers, and similar rules that govern the offering, giving, or acceptance of gifts by federal officials and employees of the executive branch. The rules are particularly restrictive for registered lobbyists, lobbying firms and for companies that employ them. Legislation enacted in 2007 makes the violation of such rules by lobbyists and those employing them a crime punishable by substantial fines and even prison time.
The basic rule on gifts to federal government officials, legislators and their staff members is straightforward: no gifts may be offered, given or accepted unless expressly allowed by rule or regulation. The word “gift” is defined broadly, and includes anything of monetary value, including meals, travel, lodging, event tickets, discounts or in-kind benefits.
The basic prohibition on gifts is subject to various express exceptions that are spelled out in the applicable rules and regulations. The most-used exceptions include those for food and refreshments of nominal value served other than as part of a meal (the so-called “toothpick” rule); attendance at widely attended events relating to official duties; attendance at charity events; and commemorative items of little intrinsic value. Another exception exists for gifts given or received based on personal friendship, but those seeking to invoke this exception must be able to demonstrate a long-term relationship with the recipient, reciprocal exchanges of gifts of roughly equal value and that the gift was not given solely due to the legislative or executive branch employee's official position. For those seeking to use this exception, the donor cannot request or obtain reimbursement by an employer.
The legislative branch gift rules permit the giving or acceptance of gifts from one source of less than $50 on one occasion and less than $100 from one source on multiple occasions in a calendar year, although registered lobbyists, lobbying firms and entities employing lobbyists may not take advantage of this exception.
Similarly, the executive branch gift rules permit gifts from one source not exceeding $20 on one occasion and not exceeding $50 in a calendar year. The rules, however, prohibit applying a “credit” in the amount applicable to that particular branch of government—of $49.99 for the legislative branch or $20 for the executive branch—and allowing the recipient to reimburse the donor for the remainder.
An important exception to the general prohibition on gifts applies when the recipient pays market value for the item. The term “market value” means the retail cost the recipient would pay to purchase the gift. For event tickets, the market value is determined by the face value of the ticket. But for tickets that do not have a face value printed on them, such as tickets to suites and sky boxes, the market value of the ticket is deemed equal to the highest-priced ticket in the stadium or arena. In venues hosting major professional sports, where front-row tickets can cost $1,000 or more per seat, the cost of the highest-priced ticket can be substantial. The fair value of any parking, food or drinks that would be provided in the suite or box also must be included in the calculation of the market value of the gift.
So what about those tickets to the big game or sold-out concert that you want to offer your senator, congressman or favorite federal regulator? If you are a registered lobbyist, lobbying firm or entity that employs lobbyists, forget it unless the recipient is willing to pay full market value. And even for those not subject to the lobbyist prohibitions, the cost of a ticket to any professional or major college sporting event is likely to far exceed the one-time thresholds contained in the rules and regulations.
For those considering giving a ticket not bearing a face value, don't do it until you do the math and the recipient is willing to pay, in advance, the equivalent of the highest-price ticket in the arena, plus the fair value of any food and beverages that will be served! Lobbyists, lobbying firms and entities employing lobbyists are required to report twice yearly on political contributions, certify that the person or firm has read and is familiar with Congressional gift and travel rules and has not knowingly violated those rules. Prior to the enactment of the Honest Leadership and Open Government Act (HLOGA) in 2007, the federal Lobbying Disclosure Act provided for a civil penalty of up to $50,000 for a knowing failure to comply with provisions of the law. See 2 U.S.C. § 1606.
HLOGA has increased the maximum civil penalty for knowing failure to comply with the act's provisions to $200,000, and imposes criminal penalties of up to five years imprisonment, fines under Title 18 or both. See 2 U.S.C. § 1606, as amended by the HLOGA, Pub. L. No. 110-81, § 211(a),121 Stat. 749 (2007).
There remain many ways to legally and ethically enhance a business' relationship with key members of Congress or with federal officials. But unless the recipient is a true personal friend or is willing to pay market value, tickets to sporting events, concerts or other performances is generally not a viable option.
Every business—large and small—knows the value of maintaining good relations with the members of Congress who represent its state and legislative district and those who serve on committees with jurisdiction over its industry. Similarly, businesses seek to maintain cordial relations with those in the executive branch of the federal government charged with regulating their industries. How better to enhance these relationships than with tickets to the big game or a sold-out concert?
Those contemplating extending such invitations, however, need to beware of gift rules and restrictions applicable to members of Congress or to their staffers, and similar rules that govern the offering, giving, or acceptance of gifts by federal officials and employees of the executive branch. The rules are particularly restrictive for registered lobbyists, lobbying firms and for companies that employ them. Legislation enacted in 2007 makes the violation of such rules by lobbyists and those employing them a crime punishable by substantial fines and even prison time.
The basic rule on gifts to federal government officials, legislators and their staff members is straightforward: no gifts may be offered, given or accepted unless expressly allowed by rule or regulation. The word “gift” is defined broadly, and includes anything of monetary value, including meals, travel, lodging, event tickets, discounts or in-kind benefits.
The basic prohibition on gifts is subject to various express exceptions that are spelled out in the applicable rules and regulations. The most-used exceptions include those for food and refreshments of nominal value served other than as part of a meal (the so-called “toothpick” rule); attendance at widely attended events relating to official duties; attendance at charity events; and commemorative items of little intrinsic value. Another exception exists for gifts given or received based on personal friendship, but those seeking to invoke this exception must be able to demonstrate a long-term relationship with the recipient, reciprocal exchanges of gifts of roughly equal value and that the gift was not given solely due to the legislative or executive branch employee's official position. For those seeking to use this exception, the donor cannot request or obtain reimbursement by an employer.
The legislative branch gift rules permit the giving or acceptance of gifts from one source of less than $50 on one occasion and less than $100 from one source on multiple occasions in a calendar year, although registered lobbyists, lobbying firms and entities employing lobbyists may not take advantage of this exception.
Similarly, the executive branch gift rules permit gifts from one source not exceeding $20 on one occasion and not exceeding $50 in a calendar year. The rules, however, prohibit applying a “credit” in the amount applicable to that particular branch of government—of $49.99 for the legislative branch or $20 for the executive branch—and allowing the recipient to reimburse the donor for the remainder.
An important exception to the general prohibition on gifts applies when the recipient pays market value for the item. The term “market value” means the retail cost the recipient would pay to purchase the gift. For event tickets, the market value is determined by the face value of the ticket. But for tickets that do not have a face value printed on them, such as tickets to suites and sky boxes, the market value of the ticket is deemed equal to the highest-priced ticket in the stadium or arena. In venues hosting major professional sports, where front-row tickets can cost $1,000 or more per seat, the cost of the highest-priced ticket can be substantial. The fair value of any parking, food or drinks that would be provided in the suite or box also must be included in the calculation of the market value of the gift.
So what about those tickets to the big game or sold-out concert that you want to offer your senator, congressman or favorite federal regulator? If you are a registered lobbyist, lobbying firm or entity that employs lobbyists, forget it unless the recipient is willing to pay full market value. And even for those not subject to the lobbyist prohibitions, the cost of a ticket to any professional or major college sporting event is likely to far exceed the one-time thresholds contained in the rules and regulations.
For those considering giving a ticket not bearing a face value, don't do it until you do the math and the recipient is willing to pay, in advance, the equivalent of the highest-price ticket in the arena, plus the fair value of any food and beverages that will be served! Lobbyists, lobbying firms and entities employing lobbyists are required to report twice yearly on political contributions, certify that the person or firm has read and is familiar with Congressional gift and travel rules and has not knowingly violated those rules. Prior to the enactment of the Honest Leadership and Open Government Act (HLOGA) in 2007, the federal Lobbying Disclosure Act provided for a civil penalty of up to $50,000 for a knowing failure to comply with provisions of the law. See
HLOGA has increased the maximum civil penalty for knowing failure to comply with the act's provisions to $200,000, and imposes criminal penalties of up to five years imprisonment, fines under Title 18 or both. See
There remain many ways to legally and ethically enhance a business' relationship with key members of Congress or with federal officials. But unless the recipient is a true personal friend or is willing to pay market value, tickets to sporting events, concerts or other performances is generally not a viable option.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCrypto Industry Eyes Legislation to Clarify Regulatory Framework
SEC Official Hints at More Restraint With Industry Bars, Less With Wells Meetings
4 minute readTrump Fires EEOC Commissioners, Kneecapping Democrat-Controlled Civil Rights Agency
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250