Despite some progress, corruption still a widespread concern in Latin America
If recent news reports are any indication, bribery, corruption and fraud are still global concerns. Evidently, Latin America is no exception, according to the recently-released Latin America Corruption Survey from Miller & Chevalier and Matteson Ellis.
June 18, 2012 at 07:56 AM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
If recent news reports are any indication, bribery, corruption and fraud are still global concerns. Evidently, Latin America is no exception, according to the recently-released Latin America Corruption Survey from Miller & Chevalier and Matteson Ellis.
Of the 439 respondents surveyed across the U.S. and Latin America, nearly 72 percent believe that their countries' anti-corruption laws are ineffective, and 44 percent of executives say that corruption is a significant obstacle to doing business. Many respondents noted that this corruption also extends to the ranks of government and law enforcement, often rendering anti-corruption laws ineffective.
Still, there has been progress in the region since a similar Miller & Chevalier study in 2008, with more respondents reporting that both businesses and governments have taken increased measures to combat corruption. Multinational corporations have generally been quicker to implement more training and due diligence procedures than their smaller regional counterparts.
“Companies understand the potentially high cost of corruption and are investing in education and other tools to protect their reputation, their employees, and their bottom line,” said James Tillen, coordinator of Miller & Chevalier's international anti-corruption practice group.
Some more key findings from the report are below:
- 92% of companies that are publicly listed in the U.S. and operate in Latin America have an anti-corruption policy
- 85% of respondents said their companies' management had taken anti-corruption steps, up from 77% in 2008
- 75% of respondents know of an offender being punished for making or receiving illicit payments, up from 69% in 2008
- 76% of Chileans said their country's anti-corruption laws are effective (the U.S. came in second, at 70%)
- 0% of Paraguayans believe that their country's anti-corruption laws are effective
Read the full survey here.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSenators Grill Visa, Mastercard Execs on Alleged Anticompetitive Practices, Fees
Trump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
Trump Likely to Keep Up Antitrust Enforcement, but Dial Back the Antagonism
5 minute readFTC Sues Cash-Advance Fintech Dave, Says It Deceives the 'Financially Vulnerable'
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250