Regulatory: Feds increase scrutiny of financial services sector for SCRA violations
The federal Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA) has come back into prominence as the country welcomes home veterans from two wars against the backdrop of the foreclosure crisis.
June 20, 2012 at 06:35 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The federal Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA) has come back into prominence as the country welcomes home veterans from two wars against the backdrop of the foreclosure crisis. The purpose of the SCRA is to strengthen the protections afforded to those serving in the U.S. Armed Forces so that they may “devote their entire energy to the defense needs of the nation.”
The law provides members of the military in active service with protection regarding a wide range of financial matters including repossession, eviction, early lease termination, taxation and insurance. It also provides relief from installment and cellular phone contracts and stipulates interest rate ceilings for members of the military. The SCRA applies in every state and territory of the U.S. and to all civil and administrative proceedings in federal, state or municipal venues. It does not apply, however, to criminal proceedings.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Rights Division and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Office have both stepped up SCRA investigations and enforcement actions against the financial services industry in the past year. SCRA compliance was also a feature of the recent landmark settlement between the DOJ and the country's five leading mortgage servicers and lenders.
As part of the settlement, lenders and servicers will hire an independent consultant to review SCRA compliance. Failure to comply will lead to an award to borrowers of at least $116,785, plus lost equity and interest. There are also two pending class action lawsuits alleging lenders failed to comply with the SCRA.
With so much attention being paid to SCRA compliance, and the potential penalties at stake, this is a significant area of current liability for the financial services industry. It is therefore important for all financial services companies to review and assess SCRA compliance when pursuing actions against delinquent borrowers who may be active military personnel.
The main step in this process is to put in place procedures to determine whether a delinquent borrower is in active service with the military. The Department of Defense (DOD) provides access to a database, the Defense Manpower Data Center, for creditors to use in verifying the status of an applicant. Additional information can also be requested in writing from the applicable military branch.
Because the database may not provide complete information, creditors should also use other means to verify a borrower's military status, such as requesting a copy of the borrower's military orders. Additional verification techniques include requesting a copy of the Servicemember's military orders, or including verification of a Servicemember borrower's status when affecting service of process. It is important to note that most servicers now require preservation of the DMDC search results as part of a best practice for compliance. We also recommend preserving both the input and results pages for each DMDC search.
Once a borrower's active military status is verified, creditors should ensure they follow the SCRA as they pursue any action, such as assessing penalties, foreclosure and initiating court proceedings. Another issue to keep in mind is when a Servicemember borrower submits active duty orders, he or she may be entitled to an interest rate reduction to 6 percent on the obligation for the period of active service plus one year. This reduction includes a waiver of service charges, late fees and renewal charges. The Servicemember borrower has 180 days following the period of active service to submit orders and the lender must apply the interest rate reduction retroactively.
Additionally, procedural protections include limitations on default judgments against Servicemembers and an expanded ability to vacate default judgments stays of civil and administrative proceedings, and tolling of civil statutes of limitations.
SCRA compliance scrutiny is not going away. In fact, with the country's continued involvement in military conflict and a struggling economy, the financial services industry will be open to liability for some time. For this reason, it is important to put in place effective SCRA compliance procedures.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCrypto Industry Eyes Legislation to Clarify Regulatory Framework
SEC Official Hints at More Restraint With Industry Bars, Less With Wells Meetings
4 minute readTrump Fires EEOC Commissioners, Kneecapping Democrat-Controlled Civil Rights Agency
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250