American Airlines reaches tentative contract agreement with pilots union
The tension between American Airlines (AA) and its pilots union has momentarily calmed.
June 28, 2012 at 06:53 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The tension between American Airlines (AA) and its pilots union has momentarily calmed.
Yesterday, the Allied Pilots Association reached a tentative contract agreement with the country's third-largest airline, which wants to make major cuts in labor spending as it is still reeling from its November 2011 bankruptcy filing. The union board voted 9-7 to allow AA's 8,000 pilots to vote on the company's proposal—which seeks to cut $315 million in annual labor costs—beginning in mid-July.
The agreement came just two days before U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Sean Lane was set to decide whether to impose AA's original proposed changes, which would have cut $1.25 billion in labor spending.
If the union ratifies the new deal, pilots will receive furlough protections, 14.8 percent pay raises over six years and 13.5 percent stake in the company as it emerges from bankruptcy.
For more InsideCounsel stories about American Airlines, read:
The tension between
Yesterday, the Allied Pilots Association reached a tentative contract agreement with the country's third-largest airline, which wants to make major cuts in labor spending as it is still reeling from its November 2011 bankruptcy filing. The union board voted 9-7 to allow AA's 8,000 pilots to vote on the company's proposal—which seeks to cut $315 million in annual labor costs—beginning in mid-July.
The agreement came just two days before U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Sean Lane was set to decide whether to impose AA's original proposed changes, which would have cut $1.25 billion in labor spending.
If the union ratifies the new deal, pilots will receive furlough protections, 14.8 percent pay raises over six years and 13.5 percent stake in the company as it emerges from bankruptcy.
For more InsideCounsel stories about
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Recent FTC Cases Against Auto Dealers Suggest Regulators Are Keeping Foot on Accelerator
6 minute read
Trending Stories
- 1Kirkland's Daniel Lavon-Krein: Staying Ahead of Private Equity Consolidation
- 2Many Southeast Law Firms Planned New, Smaller Offices in 2024
- 3On the Move and After Hours: Goldberg Segalla, Faegre Drinker, Pashman Stein
- 4Recent FTC Cases Against Auto Dealers Suggest Regulators Are Keeping Foot on Accelerator
- 5‘Not A Kindergarten Teacher’: Judge Blasts Keller Postman, Jenner & Block, in Mass Arb Dispute
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
