Dewey paid executive partner $190,000 after bankruptcy filing
A bankruptcy trustee recently rejected Dewey & LeBoeufs proposal to pay remaining workers up to $700,000 in bonuses, but that hasnt stopped the bankrupt firm from shelling out for several high-level employees.
July 24, 2012 at 08:11 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
A bankruptcy trustee recently rejected Dewey & LeBoeuf's proposal to pay remaining workers up to $700,000 in bonuses, but that hasn't stopped the bankrupt firm from shelling out for several high-level employees.
Since filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on May 28, Dewey has paid $190,000 to executive partner Stephen Horvath, who is supervising the bankrupt firm's wind-down. According to a court filing Friday, the payment compensates Horvath for work done between the bankruptcy filing and the end of June (an annual rate of nearly $2 million). He also was reimbursed for $23,563 in expenses.
Other high-level employees making bank include general counsel Janis Meyer, who earned $56,000, and director of finance Frank Canellas, who pocketed $33,333. The filing also noted that former partners in the firm's Frankfurt office received an unauthorized payment of $76,466 on May 29, though it does not specify who made the payment.
Meanwhile, the firm has managed to recoup some outstanding fees from clients: The filings show that the estate has collected $19.3 million thus far and paid out $5.7 million in expenses. In total, the firm owes creditors between $245 million and $315 million.
In a Monday filing, the firm said that it was bleeding employees, 48 of whom remain to wind down the firm. “Every employee knows this is a liquidation case with a limited employment opportunity for them,” the filing said. “It is also known that is living month to month on the use of cash collateral. [Dewey's] need to stem further employee attrition is greater now than ever.” Last week, a U.S. bankruptcy trustee rejected Dewey's proposal to pay its remaining employees up to $700,000 in incentive and retention pay, saying that the firm had failed to show the plan was economically feasible.
Dewey is also in hot water with some of its former partners, who are unhappy with a proposed clawback settlement that would shield them from future lawsuits in exchange for payments of between $25,000 and $3 million. Facing considerable opposition, Dewey agreed last week to revise the clawback plan.
Read more at Reuters.
For move InsideCounsel coverage of Dewey & LeBoeuf, see:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
8 minute readWhy ACLU's New Legal Director Says It's a 'Good Time to Take the Reins'
'Utterly Bewildering': GCs Struggle to Grasp Scattershot Nature of Law Firm Rate Hikes
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250