Regulatory: Do you need a consultant or a lobbyist?
As the interactions between business and government become more complex and fall under a wider and wider net, the need to hire government affairs specialists has increased proportionally
August 01, 2012 at 05:30 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
As the interactions between business and government become more complex and fall under a wider and wider net, the need to hire government affairs specialists has increased proportionally. The influence of government is not just on politics, it is on policy and specifically, the policies that impact your clients' bottom line. As client needs grow in this space, how do you ensure that you are represented before government as effectively as possible? Practically speaking, this begs the question: Who can you call to help?
Two choices immediately come to mind: consultants and lobbyists. Professionals in these two areas are sometimes thought of interchangeably, but in fact, there are important differences. How they approach a solution, how they are regulated and the power that they hold are key distinctions. Broadly speaking, a consultant is a professional who provides expert advice in a subject area, but normally lacks the authority to implement change. On the other hand, a lobbyist not only provides advice but then actively seeks to influence external decisions, often with significant impacts to their client's bottom line. The ability to influence change has become a key aspect of success in today's business worlds.
The “who to call” debate has been ongoing for years. The answer is that it obviously it depends on the circumstances, but one undeniable truth is that these two professions are no longer interchangeable. Calling the right professional can make all the difference in the end. The trend toward lobbyists was strongest at the federal level as our central government took on more and more power during the 1960s and 1970s. However, President Reagan persuaded a generation of voters—Democrats and Republicans— that the 10th Amendment did reserve power over many issues for the states. His view that the Founding Fathers intended for states to have all powers not reserved for the federal government and that these rights and powers should be delegated to the states whenever possible shifted the government affairs debate to the statehouses across the country.
There is certainly cross-pollination between these two professions, but the effectiveness of each specialty is maximized when they are used in a manner consistent with their experience and work history. In the end, it all comes down to whether your clients just need information on how a specific government program works and its subsequent effect on your business, or whether there is a real need to advocate for change. If information is the primary asset being sought, then hiring a consultant should be all that you need. Though the same consultant could advocate for your company on a specific issue, advocacy has become a highly regulated profession at all levels of government—local, regional, state and federal—and therefore should be left to those who are familiar with its constantly changing rules. In addition, having an experienced lobbyist leading the advocacy increases your chances at a successful outcome without increasing the risk of a political misstep.
A professional lobbyist will be able to leverage relationships to benefit your interests. Most importantly, an effective lobbyist will navigate, educate, advocate and identify legitimate business opportunities with the ultimate goal of increasing your company's bottom line. Recent research studying the effectiveness of corporate lobbying of the legislative branch of the U.S. government found that firms with the highest lobbying intensities outperformed comparable non-lobbying or less-intensely lobbying firms.
Both consultants and lobbyists have a role to play in the modern business world, but as time marches on, and the trend toward specialty work has increased, the ability to use these professions interchangeably is rapidly coming to an end. For in-depth technical information and analysis, consultants are a solid choice. But if the situation calls for a two-way dialogue and directional changes in policy, then interacting with government though a professional lobbyist is the more effective choice.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCrypto Industry Eyes Legislation to Clarify Regulatory Framework
SEC Official Hints at More Restraint With Industry Bars, Less With Wells Meetings
4 minute readTrump Fires EEOC Commissioners, Kneecapping Democrat-Controlled Civil Rights Agency
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250