Madoff trustee can pay victims $2.4 billion
Irving Picard, the trustee for fraudster Bernie Madoffs former clients, has won the right to distribute funds to some of Madoffs victims.
August 23, 2012 at 05:58 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Irving Picard, the trustee for fraudster Bernie Madoff's former clients, has won the right to distribute funds to some of Madoff's victims.
Yesterday, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Burton Lifland, approved Picard's request last month to distribute $2.4 billion to some of the conman's victims. To date, Picard has already distributed $1.1 billion to victims of Madoff.
In December 2008, Madoff was arrested for securities fraud after he masterminded one of the largest and longest running Ponzi schemes in U.S. history. In the end, Madoff cheated his clients out of between $18 billion and $20 billion, according to David Sheehan, chief counsel to Picard. Madoff pled guilty to the charges in 2009 and is currently serving a 150-year sentence.
Much of the money recovered from Madoff's scheme has been placed in reserves, as litigation over its distribution plays out. Some of the fraudster's victims believe they may be owed more than others.
Read more about this ongoing case on Thomson Reuters.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of the Madoff fiasco, see:
Irving Picard, the trustee for fraudster Bernie Madoff's former clients, has won the right to distribute funds to some of Madoff's victims.
Yesterday, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Burton Lifland, approved Picard's request last month to distribute $2.4 billion to some of the conman's victims. To date, Picard has already distributed $1.1 billion to victims of Madoff.
In December 2008, Madoff was arrested for securities fraud after he masterminded one of the largest and longest running Ponzi schemes in U.S. history. In the end, Madoff cheated his clients out of between $18 billion and $20 billion, according to David Sheehan, chief counsel to Picard. Madoff pled guilty to the charges in 2009 and is currently serving a 150-year sentence.
Much of the money recovered from Madoff's scheme has been placed in reserves, as litigation over its distribution plays out. Some of the fraudster's victims believe they may be owed more than others.
Read more about this ongoing case on Thomson Reuters.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of the Madoff fiasco, see:
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Semiconductor Component Maker Accused of Deceiving Investors About Market Downturn, Export Curbs
3 minute read
Recent FTC Cases Against Auto Dealers Suggest Regulators Are Keeping Foot on Accelerator
6 minute read
Trending Stories
- 1Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 2Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 3Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 4Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
- 5Foreign-Company Lobbyists Would Need to Register Under Proposed DOJ Regulation
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
