Chinese drywall maker to face U.S. lawsuits over allegedly faulty product
A Chinese drywall maker will face consumer claims that its product caused health problems, property damage and odor, a federal judge ruled Monday.
September 05, 2012 at 08:22 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
A Chinese drywall maker will face consumer claims that its product caused health problems, property damage and odor, a federal judge ruled Monday.
Taishan Gypsum Co. Ltd. is facing numerous claims from consumers, who say that the company's faulty drywall emits high levels of hydrogen sulfide gas. The gas not only smells of rotten eggs, but also can corrode electrical wiring and cause respiratory and skin problems.
Taishan argued that it was not subject to U.S. jurisdiction, but U.S. District Judge Eldon Fallon ruled that the company did indeed conduct business in several U.S. states. Fallon previously awarded $2.6 million in damages to seven families who complained. On Monday, he also rejected Taishan's request to vacate the default judgment, which he issued after Taishan Gypsum failed to appear in court.
Consumers have been fighting legal battles over defective drywall for years, especially in states such as Florida and Louisiana, which used large quantities of drywall after a housing boom and several damaging hurricane seasons. Just last year, Knauf Plasterboard Tianjin, a German maker of Chinese drywall, paid $800 million to settle homeowners' claims that faulty drywall contaminated their homes.
Read more at Thomson Reuters.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of faulty drywall, see:
A Chinese drywall maker will face consumer claims that its product caused health problems, property damage and odor, a federal judge ruled Monday.
Taishan Gypsum Co. Ltd. is facing numerous claims from consumers, who say that the company's faulty drywall emits high levels of hydrogen sulfide gas. The gas not only smells of rotten eggs, but also can corrode electrical wiring and cause respiratory and skin problems.
Taishan argued that it was not subject to U.S. jurisdiction, but U.S. District Judge Eldon Fallon ruled that the company did indeed conduct business in several U.S. states. Fallon previously awarded $2.6 million in damages to seven families who complained. On Monday, he also rejected Taishan's request to vacate the default judgment, which he issued after Taishan Gypsum failed to appear in court.
Consumers have been fighting legal battles over defective drywall for years, especially in states such as Florida and Louisiana, which used large quantities of drywall after a housing boom and several damaging hurricane seasons. Just last year, Knauf Plasterboard Tianjin, a German maker of Chinese drywall, paid $800 million to settle homeowners' claims that faulty drywall contaminated their homes.
Read more at Thomson Reuters.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of faulty drywall, see:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Lawsuit Against Amazon Could Reshape E-Commerce Landscape
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250