Costa Concordia passengers, Italian businesses sue Carnival in U.S.
Hundreds of passengers who were onboard the ill-fated Costa Concordia, as well as thousands of businesses located on the Italian island where the cruise ship capsized in January, have filed U.S. lawsuits against Carnival Corp. for millions of dollars in damages.
September 12, 2012 at 06:56 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Hundreds of passengers who were onboard the ill-fated Costa Concordia, as well as thousands of businesses located on the Italian island where the cruise ship capsized in January, have filed U.S. lawsuits against Carnival Corp. for millions of dollars in damages. The suit claims the Miami-based company that owns the Italian Costa brand is ultimately responsible for negligence that caused the accident that killed 32 people.
After the shipwreck, litigation experts speculated that passengers wouldn't be able to pursue litigation against Carnival in the U.S. because of a forum clause on their tickets stating that ticketholders must bring lawsuits in Genoa, Italy, where Carnival's Costa Crociere subsidiary is located. But so far, that hasn't deterred plaintiffs lawyers from filing suits against Carnival in federal and state courts. They claim Costa Crociere and all of Carnival's other brands answer to Carnival's Miami headquarters. Additionally, plaintiffs lawyers say Italian courts would take years longer to resolve litigation and wouldn't allow class actions.
One lawsuit seeks to represent a class of tourist-related businesses on the Italian island where the Costa Concordia crashed. The suit claims the disaster discouraged visitors, polluted local waters and lowered property values. Other suits representing Costa Concordia passengers claim Carnival could have prevented the disaster by improving training of its ships' officers and insisting on safer operations onboard.
Meanwhile, Carnival says the Costa line of cruise ships is a separate corporate entity that it doesn't manage on a day-to-day basis.
“This is an Italian dispute and should be tried in an Italian court,” Thad Dameris, a lawyer representing Carnival in the case involving the island businesses, told the Associated Press. “This case has no real connection to the United States.”
For more InsideCounsel stories about the Costa Concordia wreck and ensuing litigation, read:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCoinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute readBaker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250