Chinese writers win copyright battle against search engine Baidu
A Chinese court awarded damages to three well-known authors in their copyright battle against search engine giant Baidu Inc., ruling that the company failed to prevent the writers works from being illegally posted on its document sharing site.
September 18, 2012 at 07:59 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
A Chinese court awarded damages to three well-known authors in their copyright battle against search engine giant Baidu Inc., ruling that the company failed to prevent the writers' works from being illegally posted on its document sharing site.
But it wasn't quite a storybook ending for the victorious scribes. The trio, which included blogger Han Han and novelist Hao Qun, won just 145,000 yuan ($22,900) in damages, significantly less than the 760,000 yuan ($120,280) they originally sought. The court also denied the authors' request to shutter Baidu's document sharing site.
The Writers' Union, a group Han Han founded to fight the online distribution of copyrighted works, said in a blog post that the low damages amount—which was less than the royalties the authors would have earned off the books—will likely do little to stem the tide of online copyright infringement.
“This clearly demonstrates a problem,” the organization wrote, according to the Wall Street Journal. “Currently Internet copyright infringement laws and judicial interpretations are not close to preventing the use of the Internet to spread copyrighted material illegally.”
But Baidu says that it has taken steps to guard against illegal distribution of copyrighted works, including eliminating more than two million files and implementing a system to verify the legality of posted materials.
Read more at the Wall Street Journal.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of copyright battles, see:
A Chinese court awarded damages to three well-known authors in their copyright battle against search engine giant Baidu Inc., ruling that the company failed to prevent the writers' works from being illegally posted on its document sharing site.
But it wasn't quite a storybook ending for the victorious scribes. The trio, which included blogger Han Han and novelist Hao Qun, won just 145,000 yuan ($22,900) in damages, significantly less than the 760,000 yuan ($120,280) they originally sought. The court also denied the authors' request to shutter Baidu's document sharing site.
The Writers' Union, a group Han Han founded to fight the online distribution of copyrighted works, said in a blog post that the low damages amount—which was less than the royalties the authors would have earned off the books—will likely do little to stem the tide of online copyright infringement.
“This clearly demonstrates a problem,” the organization wrote, according to the Wall Street Journal. “Currently Internet copyright infringement laws and judicial interpretations are not close to preventing the use of the Internet to spread copyrighted material illegally.”
But Baidu says that it has taken steps to guard against illegal distribution of copyrighted works, including eliminating more than two million files and implementing a system to verify the legality of posted materials.
Read more at the Wall Street Journal.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of copyright battles, see:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRepublican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
4 minute readSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
FTC Lauds Withdrawal of Proposed Indiana Hospitals Merger After Leaning on State Regulators
4 minute readHow Qualcomm’s General Counsel Is Championing Diversity in Innovation
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250